[Type the company name]
HED4805 Assignment 1
(100% COMPLETE
ANSWERS) 2025 (149215) -
DUE 16 May 2025
NO PLAGIARISM
[Year]
, Book
The History of Education Under Apartheid, 1948-1994
South African History of Education - HED4805 Assignment 1 2025 (149215) -
DUE 16 May 2025 ;100 % TRUSTED workings, Expert Solved, Explanations
and SolutionsWith reference to the text provided, answer the following
questions: 1.1 Explain which one of the two hunting methods i.e., the use of bows
and arrows, or the use of poisoning do you think was the most effective for the San
people.
The use of poisoned arrows was the most effective hunting method for the San people. While
both bows and arrows and poisoning played a role, poisoned arrows provided distinct
advantages:
1. Increased Lethality – The poison, usually extracted from beetle larvae or plant toxins,
ensured that even if the arrow did not immediately kill the animal, it would eventually
weaken and die.
2. Reduced Risk and Effort – Unlike direct hunting with spears or chasing animals,
poisoned arrows allowed the San hunters to wound their prey from a distance,
minimizing the risk of injury.
3. Efficiency in Open Terrain – The San hunted in open savannas and deserts where
tracking a wounded, poisoned animal was easier than engaging in close combat.
4. Preservation of Energy – Instead of expending too much energy in a chase, hunters
could shoot an animal and follow it until the poison took effect.
Thus, while bows and arrows were necessary tools, the addition of poison made hunting
significantly more effective for the survival of the San people.
The use of poisoning was likely the most effective hunting method for the San people. Here’s
why:
1. Higher Success Rate – Poisoned arrows increased the chances of a successful hunt. Even
if the arrow did not immediately kill the animal, the poison ensured that it would
eventually succumb, allowing hunters to track and retrieve it.
, 2. Ability to Hunt Larger Animals – Poisoning allowed the San to hunt larger and more
dangerous animals, such as antelope or even larger prey like giraffes, which would have
been difficult to kill with a non-poisoned arrow alone.
3. Less Immediate Risk – Unlike spear hunting or direct combat, poisoned arrows allowed
hunters to wound animals from a safe distance, reducing the risk of injury from
aggressive prey.
4. Efficient Use of Resources – San hunters used small arrows, which meant they didn’t
need large amounts of raw materials to make weapons. Poison compensated for the small
size by ensuring that even a minor wound could lead to a successful kill.
5. Stealth and Precision – Poisoned arrows allowed for more stealthy hunting, as hunters
could strike from a distance and avoid alerting other animals, making it easier to hunt
multiple animals in one outing.
While the use of bows and arrows was crucial for delivering the poison, it was the poison itself
that made the method truly effective for survival in the harsh environments where the San lived.
.
1.2 Briefly discuss the role of education in the hunting way of life for San and
Khoi people, and in their struggle for survival in their indigenous
environment. (10)
he Role of Education in the Hunting Way of Life for the San and Khoi People
Education played a crucial role in the survival of the San (hunter-gatherers) and Khoi
(pastoralists) by ensuring that essential knowledge, skills, and cultural values were passed down
through generations. Their education was informal, practical, and deeply connected to their
environment.
1. Survival Skills – Young San and Khoi learned to identify edible plants, track animals,
and find water sources in harsh environments. This knowledge was critical for
sustenance.
2. Hunting and Gathering Techniques – San boys were taught how to use bows, arrows,
and poisons, while girls learned about gathering fruits, roots, and medicinal plants. The
Khoi, as herders, learned animal care and seasonal migration patterns.
HED4805 Assignment 1
(100% COMPLETE
ANSWERS) 2025 (149215) -
DUE 16 May 2025
NO PLAGIARISM
[Year]
, Book
The History of Education Under Apartheid, 1948-1994
South African History of Education - HED4805 Assignment 1 2025 (149215) -
DUE 16 May 2025 ;100 % TRUSTED workings, Expert Solved, Explanations
and SolutionsWith reference to the text provided, answer the following
questions: 1.1 Explain which one of the two hunting methods i.e., the use of bows
and arrows, or the use of poisoning do you think was the most effective for the San
people.
The use of poisoned arrows was the most effective hunting method for the San people. While
both bows and arrows and poisoning played a role, poisoned arrows provided distinct
advantages:
1. Increased Lethality – The poison, usually extracted from beetle larvae or plant toxins,
ensured that even if the arrow did not immediately kill the animal, it would eventually
weaken and die.
2. Reduced Risk and Effort – Unlike direct hunting with spears or chasing animals,
poisoned arrows allowed the San hunters to wound their prey from a distance,
minimizing the risk of injury.
3. Efficiency in Open Terrain – The San hunted in open savannas and deserts where
tracking a wounded, poisoned animal was easier than engaging in close combat.
4. Preservation of Energy – Instead of expending too much energy in a chase, hunters
could shoot an animal and follow it until the poison took effect.
Thus, while bows and arrows were necessary tools, the addition of poison made hunting
significantly more effective for the survival of the San people.
The use of poisoning was likely the most effective hunting method for the San people. Here’s
why:
1. Higher Success Rate – Poisoned arrows increased the chances of a successful hunt. Even
if the arrow did not immediately kill the animal, the poison ensured that it would
eventually succumb, allowing hunters to track and retrieve it.
, 2. Ability to Hunt Larger Animals – Poisoning allowed the San to hunt larger and more
dangerous animals, such as antelope or even larger prey like giraffes, which would have
been difficult to kill with a non-poisoned arrow alone.
3. Less Immediate Risk – Unlike spear hunting or direct combat, poisoned arrows allowed
hunters to wound animals from a safe distance, reducing the risk of injury from
aggressive prey.
4. Efficient Use of Resources – San hunters used small arrows, which meant they didn’t
need large amounts of raw materials to make weapons. Poison compensated for the small
size by ensuring that even a minor wound could lead to a successful kill.
5. Stealth and Precision – Poisoned arrows allowed for more stealthy hunting, as hunters
could strike from a distance and avoid alerting other animals, making it easier to hunt
multiple animals in one outing.
While the use of bows and arrows was crucial for delivering the poison, it was the poison itself
that made the method truly effective for survival in the harsh environments where the San lived.
.
1.2 Briefly discuss the role of education in the hunting way of life for San and
Khoi people, and in their struggle for survival in their indigenous
environment. (10)
he Role of Education in the Hunting Way of Life for the San and Khoi People
Education played a crucial role in the survival of the San (hunter-gatherers) and Khoi
(pastoralists) by ensuring that essential knowledge, skills, and cultural values were passed down
through generations. Their education was informal, practical, and deeply connected to their
environment.
1. Survival Skills – Young San and Khoi learned to identify edible plants, track animals,
and find water sources in harsh environments. This knowledge was critical for
sustenance.
2. Hunting and Gathering Techniques – San boys were taught how to use bows, arrows,
and poisons, while girls learned about gathering fruits, roots, and medicinal plants. The
Khoi, as herders, learned animal care and seasonal migration patterns.
