1 2025 - DUE 2025; 100% correct solutions and explanations
Question 1
Section A is based on the given extract from chapter 2 of the
prescribed textbook (Seroto, Davids & Wolhuter 2020). Read
the extract and then answer the questions that follow.
Geographical focus of research and of authorship
Scholars, analysts, progressive scholars and academics in
all education sciences and beyond, have expressed
concern that the corpus of scholarly publications is
dominated by researchers in the global world and that
their focus is lopsided in favour of the Global North or
themes favoured by the interests of the Global
North. In a content analysis of articles published in the first 50
years of the top journal in the field of Comparative and
International Education, the Comparative Education
Review, Wolhuter (2008:330-331) found that countries of
the Global North dominate the geographical focus of
research. In addition, where countries of the Global South
are the subject of research, it is dominated by researchers
from the Global North (cf Wolhuter, 2018). Of the 18 523
articles published in the total pool of Thomson-Reuters
,indexed education journals for the year 2012, a mere
2.13% were authored by scholars in Africa (ibid).
Depaepe and Simon (1996) do not include the
geographical terrain of articles in their research but do
provide an interesting analysis of author provenance. For
the articles published during 1961 to 1989 in
Paedagogica Historica, the rank-order of national
provenance of authors is illustrated in table 2.2. The
pattern for the period 1990 to 1995 does not differ much.
However, in this period, the Global South fares worse
with 1.6% of all authors (South Africa: 0.8% and Zaire:
0.8%) as shown in table 2.3.
Table 2.2 National provenance of authors published in
rank order, 1961 to 1989
National provenance of authors (Global North) 1961 to 1989
1. Germany: 22.7%; 2. US: 21.5%; 3. UK: 10.6%; 4. France: 7.4%; 5.
Belgium: 6.5%
National provenance of authors (Global South) 1961 to 1989
1. India: 1.2%; 2. Malaysia: 1.2%; 3. Nigeria: 0.6%; 4. Sri Lanka:
0.6%; 5. Argentina: 0.3%; 6. Oman:
0.3%; 7. Pakistan: 0.3%; 8. South Africa: 0.3%; 9.
, Thailand: 0.3%; 10. Zimbabwe: 0.3% (Source: Depaepe &
Simon, 1996:426)
Table 2.3 National provenance of authors published in
rank order, 1990 to 1995
National provenance of authors (Global North) 1990 to 1995
1. Netherlands: 20.2%; 2. Germany: 17.8%; 3. Belgium: 14.0%; 4
France: 10.1%; 5. US: 7.0%
National provenance of authors (Global South) 1990 to 1995
1. Only 1.6% of all authors in the Global South; 2. South Africa: 0.8%;
3. Former Zaire: 0.8%
(Source: Depaepe & Simon, 1996)
Freeman and Kirke (2017) deal with geographical foci in
their analysis, although the limitation of their study is that
it covers English medium journals only. Freeman and
Kirke (2017:830) found that in geographical coverage,
throughout the period 1952 to 2016, England and Great
Britain dominated as geographical terrain of study.
During the decade 1980 to 1989, 43.9% of all published
articles dealt with England and Great Britain; in 2016,