100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached 4.2 TrustPilot
logo-home
Exam (elaborations)

ENG1503 Assignment 1 (COMPLETE ANSWERS) Semester 1 2025 (769162) - DUE 24 March 2025

Rating
-
Sold
-
Pages
12
Grade
A+
Uploaded on
14-03-2025
Written in
2024/2025

ENG1503 Assignment 1 (COMPLETE ANSWERS) Semester 1 2025 (769162) - DUE 24 March 2025 correct questions and answers and for any assignment assistance or getting any latest exam packs kindly email at ,,, Teaching Information Literacy in an Age of Misinformation Krista Black, EdD February 28, 2024 The first time I encountered a student who “just didn’t believe” the data I was using in my sociology class, it caught me off guard. I don’t recall exactly how I responded in the moment, but with the benefit of hindsight I now know it was a tremor in what would become a seismic shift in our educational landscape. Students who are in their late teens or early twenties have spent their educational experiences navigating misinformation, fake news, and alternative facts. I didn’t realize until my student made the comment above on how the broader shift in our society toward scientific skepticism would bear out in the classroom. This unexpected moment in the classroom alerted me to an opportunity to explore and expand the scope of information literacy skills I incorporate in my courses. I had started integrating information literacy skills into my sociology classes with a narrow focus that built on research method topics that were appropriate for an introductory course. We talked about interpreting statistics like percent change, visual representations of data, survey design, and sampling. My goal was to support both students’ learning of sociology in the course and their broader consumption of information outside of the classroom. As we worked through information literacy lessons in class, I gained insights into how students access and process information in their day-to-day lives. My students reported getting their news from social media, news apps, television news, and friends and family members. They are aware of mis- and disinformation, the fact that social media is designed to be attention-grabbing, and that not all sources are reliable. This, from my perspective, is a good thing. What I see as a challenge that we as educators must grapple with, is our students’ selective desire to apply these misgivings towards not just all information, but particularly those sources of information that clash with their preferred vision for how things “should” be (i.e., motivated reasoning). Through this process of teaching, getting student feedback, and revising my materials, I learned that my initial information literacy focus was too narrow. Yes, students need to know how to interpret statistics—but first they need to know whether they can trust the source in the first place. In response to this, my focus in teaching information literacy has broadened to include evaluating credibility and point of view in sources. I want to help them move beyond skepticism and distrust of sources to critical thinking. Rather than approaching every source with, “This might be wrong,” my goal is to help them practice evaluating, “How can I verify the credibility of this?” When I teach information literacy now, I focus my efforts on developing student skills in three areas. Black, K. 2024. Teaching information literacy in an age of misinformation.

Show more Read less









Whoops! We can’t load your doc right now. Try again or contact support.

Document information

Uploaded on
March 14, 2025
Number of pages
12
Written in
2024/2025
Type
Exam (elaborations)
Contains
Questions & answers

Subjects

Content preview

ENG1503
Assignment 1
(COMPLETE ANSWERS)
Semester 1 2025
(769162)



DUE 24 March 2025

, ACTIVITIES

Teaching Information Literacy in an Age of Misinformation Krista Black, EdD February 28, 2024 The
first time I encountered a student who “just didn’t believe” the data I was using in my sociology class,
it caught me off guard. I don’t recall exactly how I responded in the moment, but with the benefit of
hindsight I now know it was a tremor in what would become a seismic shift in our educational
landscape. Students who are in their late teens or early twenties have spent their educational
experiences navigating misinformation, fake news, and alternative facts. I didn’t realize until my
student made the comment above on how the broader shift in our society toward scientific
skepticism would bear out in the classroom. This unexpected moment in the classroom alerted me to
an opportunity to explore and expand the scope of information literacy skills I incorporate in my
courses. I had started integrating information literacy skills into my sociology classes with a narrow
focus that built on research method topics that were appropriate for an introductory course. We
talked about interpreting statistics like percent change, visual representations of data, survey design,
and sampling. My goal was to support both students’ learning of sociology in the course and their
broader consumption of information outside of the classroom. As we worked through information
literacy lessons in class, I gained insights into how students access and process information in their
day-to-day lives. My students reported getting their news from social media, news apps, television
news, and friends and family members. They are aware of mis- and disinformation, the fact that social
media is designed to be attention-grabbing, and that not all sources are reliable. This, from my
perspective, is a good thing. What I see as a challenge that we as educators must grapple with, is our
students’ selective desire to apply these misgivings towards not just all information, but particularly
those sources of information that clash with their preferred vision for how things “should” be (i.e.,
motivated reasoning). Through this process of teaching, getting student feedback, and revising my
materials, I learned that my initial information literacy focus was too narrow. Yes, students need to
know how to interpret statistics—but first they need to know whether they can trust the source in the
first place. In response to this, my focus in teaching information literacy has broadened to include
evaluating credibility and point of view in sources. I want to help them move beyond skepticism and
distrust of sources to critical thinking. Rather than approaching every source with, “This might be
wrong,” my goal is to help them practice evaluating, “How can I verify the credibility of this?” When I
teach information literacy now, I focus my efforts on developing student skills in three areas. Black, K.
2024. Teaching information literacy in an age of misinformation.
https://www.facultyfocus.com/articles/effective-classroom-management/teaching-information-
literacy-in-an-age-of-
misinformation/?st=FFdaily;sc=FF240228;utm_term=FF240228&mailingID=6165&utm_source=Active
Campaign&utm_medium=email&utm_content=Teaching+Information+Literacy+in+an+Age+of+Mis
information&utm_campaign=FF240131. [Accessed 29 February 2024]. QUESTION 1 1.1 Discuss the
target audience of this text and justify your response on your choice of the target audience. [5 Marks]
Identification of the target audience = 1 mark Reason = 2 marks Language and structure = 2 marks
1.2. In your opinion, what are the four (4) ways in which teaching literacy can lead to misinformation?
(150 words) [10 Marks] Four ways teaching literacy has led to misinformation (4 x 2 = 8 marks)
Language and structure = 2 marks 1.3. In your own words, summarise the text in four (4) discussion
points. (150 words) [10 Marks] Discussion points (4 X 2 = 8 marks) Language and structure = 2 marks
1.4. Indicate THREE (3) unique examples of informal language in the text. Justify why each example is
informal. [10 Marks] Each example = 3 marks Marks for justification = 3 marks Language and
structure = 4 marks 1.5. Explain THREE (3) effects of misinformation from the given text? In addition,
reflect on your personal experiences with fake news, discussing how it has impacted you or those
around you. [15 Marks]

Get to know the seller

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
ochiengglorious5 Chamberlain College Of Nursing
View profile
Follow You need to be logged in order to follow users or courses
Sold
49
Member since
1 year
Number of followers
1
Documents
85
Last sold
1 month ago

4,0

10 reviews

5
5
4
2
3
2
2
0
1
1

Recently viewed by you

Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their exams and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can immediately select a different document that better matches what you need.

Pay how you prefer, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card or EFT and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Frequently asked questions