100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached 4,6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Exam (elaborations)

ECS3707 Assignment 3 Semester 2 2024 | Due 17 September 2024

Rating
-
Sold
-
Pages
15
Grade
A+
Uploaded on
13-09-2024
Written in
2024/2025

ECS3707 Assignment 3 Semester 2 2024 | Due 17 September 2024. All questions answered.  Question 1 1. Critically assess the merits of using economic metrics such as Gross Domestic Product (GDP) per capita versus broader multidimensional measures like the Human Development Index (HDI) or Multidimensional Poverty Index (MPI) for understanding development progress. 1.1. Compare and contrast the key components and methodologies of GDP per capita, HDI, and MPI. What aspects of development does each aim to capture? 1.2. Evaluate the strengths and limitations of GDP per capita as a measure of development based on Amartya Sen's capability framework. How well does it reflect people's substantive freedoms and capabilities? 1.3. Analyse how the HDI and MPI incorporate the capability approach compared to GDP per capita. Do they provide a more comprehensive picture of development? Explain why or why not.  Question 2 2. Apply the different measurement approaches to contrast the development levels of Rwanda and Ghana using the following data sources: Rwanda: UNDP Human Development Report - Rwanda (Ghana: UNDP Human Development Report - Ghana) 2.1. Summarise Rwanda's key development indicators from the AfDB report, including GDP per capita, life expectancy, expected years of schooling, and MPI. How do these paint Rwanda's development picture? 2.2. Outline Ghana's main development statistics from the World Bank overview, such as GDP growth, poverty rates, literacy, and inequality metrics. What do these indicate about Ghana's development status? 2.3. Compare Rwanda and Ghana's development levels and progress using GDP per capita. Which country seems more developed based on this metric and why? 2.4. Contrast your GDP per capita assessment by comparing Rwanda and Ghana using their HDI and MPI values. Does this alter your conclusion about their relative development levels? Why or why not? 2.5. Which measurement approach provides a fuller understanding of development in Rwanda and Ghana based on your analysis? Justify your answer.  Question 3 3. Conclude by arguing whether economic metrics, multidimensional indices, or a combination of both are needed to assess development progress comprehensively. 3.1. Summarise the critical insights from comparing GDP per capita to the HDI and MPI to evaluate development in general and for Rwanda and Ghana. 3.2. Make a case for what development metrics policymakers should prioritize and why. Consider the benefits and drawbacks of narrow versus broad measures. 3.3. Explain how Amartya Sen's capability approach can guide the creation and use of development indices from now on to capture what matters for human well-being and freedom.

Show more Read less









Whoops! We can’t load your doc right now. Try again or contact support.

Document information

Uploaded on
September 13, 2024
Number of pages
15
Written in
2024/2025
Type
Exam (elaborations)
Contains
Questions & answers

Subjects

Content preview

, PLEASE USE THIS DOCUMENT AS A GUIDE TO ANSWER YOUR ASSIGNMENT

Please note that the author of this document will not responsibility for any plagiarizing you
commit.

 Question 1

1. Critically assess the merits of using economic metrics such as Gross Domestic Product (GDP)
per capita versus broader multidimensional measures like the Human Development Index (HDI)
or Multidimensional Poverty Index (MPI) for understanding development progress.

1.1. Compare and contrast the key components and methodologies of GDP per capita, HDI, and
MPI. What aspects of development does each aim to capture?

Economic development has traditionally been measured using economic metrics such as Gross
Domestic Product (GDP) per capita, but in recent decades, broader, multidimensional measures like
the Human Development Index (HDI) and Multidimensional Poverty Index (MPI) have gained
prominence. These newer indices attempt to capture a wider array of factors influencing human
well-being, as GDP per capita alone has been increasingly criticized for its limitations in reflecting
overall quality of life, distribution of wealth, or social welfare. This essay critically assesses the
merits of using GDP per capita in comparison to HDI and MPI for understanding development
progress by first comparing and contrasting their components and methodologies, and then
examining the aspects of development that each aims to capture.

GDP Per Capita
GDP per capita is the most widely used economic metric for measuring development. It is calculated
by dividing a country’s total Gross Domestic Product—the monetary value of all goods and services
produced within its borders—by its population. This gives an average income per person and is often
interpreted as an indicator of the standard of living in a country.

Key Components and Methodology
GDP per capita is an aggregate measure that reflects the size of an economy relative to its population.
Its calculation involves:

 Total GDP: The sum of all economic activities within a country, including consumption,
investment, government spending, and net exports.
 Population: The total number of people in the country.

The merit of GDP per capita lies in its simplicity and comprehensiveness in capturing economic
activity. It provides a clear indication of a country's economic size and growth potential, helping to
track whether a nation’s economy is expanding or contracting over time. However, its limitations are
equally notable. GDP per capita does not account for income distribution, regional disparities, or
non-economic aspects of development such as education, health, or quality of life. It also fails to
capture environmental degradation or the sustainability of growth, thus offering only a narrow view
of development focused primarily on wealth creation.

Get to know the seller

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
Aimark94 University of South Africa (Unisa)
View profile
Follow You need to be logged in order to follow users or courses
Sold
6623
Member since
6 year
Number of followers
3168
Documents
1345
Last sold
1 hour ago
Simple & Affordable Study Materials

Study Packs & Assignments

4,2

534 reviews

5
284
4
128
3
75
2
15
1
32

Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their exams and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can immediately select a different document that better matches what you need.

Pay how you prefer, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card or EFT and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Frequently asked questions