100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached 4.2 TrustPilot
logo-home
Exam (elaborations)

HRPYC81 Project 4 Report Guide Assignment 16 2024

Rating
-
Sold
8
Pages
108
Grade
A
Uploaded on
09-09-2024
Written in
2024/2025

Detailed research report guide with example answers for the sections, additional notes and tips, AND links for additional resources. PLUS , an example of accepting/rejecting hypotheses using the 2024 results and a past report that got 95%.

Show more Read less











Whoops! We can’t load your doc right now. Try again or contact support.

Document information

Uploaded on
September 9, 2024
Number of pages
108
Written in
2024/2025
Type
Exam (elaborations)
Contains
Questions & answers

Subjects

Content preview

HRPYC81

RESEARCH PROJECT 4:

REPORT GUIDE 2024

Assessment 16

, Property of Perfectionist Notes
Illegal distribution/selling/use will be prosecuted




Contents
1. Instructions ..................................................................................................................................... 2
2. The broad topic ............................................................................................................................... 4
3. The Rubric ....................................................................................................................................... 6
4. STRUCTURE OF THE REPORT ........................................................................................................... 7
5. APA 7TH EDITION REFERENCING GUIDE......................................................................................... 56
6. Past Project that got 95%.............................................................................................................. 63

, Property of Perfectionist Notes
Illegal distribution/selling/use will be prosecuted



1. Instructions

Research Area: Social Psychology

Project Title: Bullshitting is terrible, but lying is worse. Or isn’t it?

Limited to 200 students

Project Description
• To be minimally functional, members of a society must respect the importance of honesty
and clarity in reporting facts (Frankfurt, 2021, p. 16), as the latter allows for making well-
informed judgments and decisions.
• However, it appears that the respect for truth and facts is disappearing as the social
phenomena of bullshit and lying have become commonplace within the very fabric of
societies.
• Facts become “alternative facts”, misinformation and subjective opinions replace evidence,
or the existence of “objective” truth is questioned at all (Petrocelli, 2021a).

• Both bullshitting and lying have in common that they are related to concerns about the
truth.
• However, they differ in their underlying motivations because the liar conceives the truth
(and spreads falsehood), whereas the bullshitter is indifferent to the truth.

• Consequently, a critical distinction between a liar and a bullshitter is that a liar's motivation
is to deceive with falsehood, while the bullshitter's motivation is to promote impressions (or
avoid negative ones) by using elusion and exaggeration.
• Both conceiving the truth and being indifferent to the truth can be dangerous as it may lead
“to false beliefs and destructive decisions” which may harm health and life



• Bullshit, which was first theoretically conceptualised by the American philosopher Harry G
Frankfurt (1986/2005) in his seminal work On Bullshit, is broadly understood as
communication with little to no regard for the truth and no concern for how things really
are.
• Bullshitters, irrespective of whether they act intentionally or unintentionally, have no
regard for the truth, evidentiary support, empirical knowledge or established semantics,
and logic.
• Lying and bullshitting are common in many domains of social life, like organisations,
universities and sciences, financial institutions, self-help industry, politics, and the fields of
sports and coaching.
• Although both bullshitting and lying constitute in most societies and communities acts of
norm violations, it seems that people are more forgiving towards the bullshitter than the
liar. These findings are considered surprising because bullshitting is considered a more
insidious threat to people than lying.

, Property of Perfectionist Notes
Illegal distribution/selling/use will be prosecuted


INSIDIOUS: Something that is insidious is unpleasant or dangerous and develops gradually without
being noticed.

THREAT: a statement of an intention to inflict pain, injury, damage, or other hostile actions



• This contradiction is also known as the insidious bullshit hypothesis (i.e., bullshitting is
evaluated less negatively than lying, but bullshit can be more harmful than lies).

• The present research project will test the insidious bullshit hypothesis within the South
African context

• and explore whether factors like the status and trustworthiness of the source (of
bullshitting and lying) influence whether people are indeed more forgiving towards the
bullshitter than the liar.




Students in this research project will learn about:

• the psychological concepts of bullshitting and lying
• and related factors that might determine the when and why of the insidious bullshit
hypothesis.



VIDEOS TO WATCH ON THE “insidious bullshit hypothesis”:

1) Persuasive Bullshitters and the Insidious Bullshit Hypothesis with John Petrocelli:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5zuVxSqpaR0
THIS IS A GREAT VIDEO – GOES INTO THE WHEN AND WHY OF BULSHITTING


2) Persuasive Bullshitters and the Insidious Bullshit Hypothesis with John Petrocelli:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U0ZOUucWiKo

This research will be done using an experimental research design, which will be
conducted online and hosted on the research platform Qualtrics.



ASSIGNMENT INFORMATION FOR THE PORTFOLIO
FOURTH ASSIGNMENT

• ASSESSMENT NUMBER 16
• Write the research report (i.e., portfolio) in which you describe the study, provide the
results, and discuss the findings and their implications.
• The research report should not exceed twenty (20) pages (excluding the front page, table of
contents, references, and appendix).

Get to know the seller

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
PerfectionistNotes University of South Africa (Unisa)
View profile
Follow You need to be logged in order to follow users or courses
Sold
4715
Member since
3 year
Number of followers
1049
Documents
175
Last sold
1 month ago
Perfectionist Notes - private psych hons assistance

Specialising in assistance for Counselling Psychology Honours students. I have worked hard to create reliable content for the students as well as personalized assistance.

4,4

679 reviews

5
424
4
143
3
67
2
25
1
20

Recently viewed by you

Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their exams and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can immediately select a different document that better matches what you need.

Pay how you prefer, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card or EFT and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Frequently asked questions