100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached 4,6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Exam (elaborations)

MNP3703 Assignment 2 Semester 2 2024 - DUE 12 September 2024

Rating
-
Sold
-
Pages
16
Grade
A+
Uploaded on
02-09-2024
Written in
2024/2025

MNP3703 Assignment 2 Semester 2 2024 - DUE 12 September 2024 QUESTIONS WITH COMPLETE ANSWERS











Whoops! We can’t load your doc right now. Try again or contact support.

Document information

Uploaded on
September 2, 2024
Number of pages
16
Written in
2024/2025
Type
Exam (elaborations)
Contains
Questions & answers

Content preview

MNP3703 Assignment 2
Semester 2 2024 - DUE 12
September 2024
QUESTIONS WITH COMPLETE ANSWERS




[DATE]
[COMPANY NAME]
[Company address]

,MNP3703 Assignment 2 Semester 2 2024 - DUE 12 September 2024



Question 1

The Cox Supplier Relationship Model is based on two theories – the
Transaction-based theory (TBT) and the Resource-based theory (RBT).
Using the model, analyse the elements of the RBT - corporate architecture,
innovation, and reputation - to demonstrate its contribution to Caterpillar
Inc. (CAT) and Barloworld Equipment’s competitive advantage within the
industrial equipment and services industry, particularly in the context of
their operations in southern Africa. (3 marks)

Question 1

Analyse the elements of the RBT - corporate architecture, innovation, and
reputation to demonstrate its contribution to their competitive advantage
within the industrial equipment and services industry. Clearly demonstrates
the contribution of the RBT elements to the competitive advantage of CAT
and Barloworld Equipment within the industrial equipment and services
industry, specifically in their operations in southern Africa. OR Discusses
theory and provides specific examples from the case study, illustrating in
great detail how the contribution adds to the partnership's strengths in each
element, giving them a competitive edge. Discuss all RBT elements that
contribute to CAT and Barloworld Equipment’s competitive advantage, but
is not specific to the industrial equipment and services industry. OR
Discuss all RBT elements that contribute to CAT and Barloworld
Equipment’s competitive advantage, but is not fully specific to their
operations in southern Africa. Discuss all RBT elements and how it relates

, to CAT and Barloworld Equipment, but lacks understanding of the
competitive advantages it poses for these organisations OR Mention the
level that both CAT and Barloworld Equipment invest in the relationship,
but do not provide relevant examples from the case study. OR Does not
discuss all three elements: corporate architecture, innovation, and
reputation. Discusses the Cox Supplier Relationship Model not focussing
on the theory of RBT and without application to the case study. OR
Discusses the elements of the RBT without application to the case study.
OR Provides irrelevant information related to the RBT elements’
contribution to the competitive advantage that CAT and Barloworld
Equipment devote to their relationship. OR No answer is provided. OR The
question has been flagged for unethical conduct (e.g. AI generated) or as
plagiarised. Question 2 There are six aspects to consider when a
partnership is evaluated. Assess the strategic effectiveness of the
partnership between Barloworld Equipment and Caterpillar Inc. (CAT).
Focus on how these aspects have contributed to their success in the
industrial equipment and services industry, particularly within the context of
their operations in southern Africa. (6 marks) Rubric: OUTSTANDING
STANDARD (6 marks) EXCEEDS STANDARD (5 marks) MEETS
STANDARD (4 marks) PROGRESSING STANDARD (3 marks)
DEVELOPING STANDARD (2 marks) BELOW STANDARD (1 mark)
UNSATISFACTORY (0 marks)

Question 2

Assess the strategic effectiveness of the partnership between Barloworld
Equipment and Caterpillar Inc. (CAT). Demonstrates a thorough
understanding by providing specific examples from the case study for each

Get to know the seller

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
reinah44 George Washington University
View profile
Follow You need to be logged in order to follow users or courses
Sold
407
Member since
2 year
Number of followers
336
Documents
1224
Last sold
1 month ago

3,8

33 reviews

5
15
4
6
3
7
2
2
1
3

Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their exams and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can immediately select a different document that better matches what you need.

Pay how you prefer, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card or EFT and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Frequently asked questions