100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached 4,6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Exam (elaborations)

PHIL 3010 C168 Critical Thinking and Logic latest Exam 2024 Complete question and answer WGU

Rating
-
Sold
-
Pages
16
Grade
A+
Uploaded on
01-09-2024
Written in
2024/2025

PHIL 3010 C168 Critical Thinking and Logic latest Exam 2024 Complete question and answer WGU

Institution
Course










Whoops! We can’t load your doc right now. Try again or contact support.

Written for

Institution
Course

Document information

Uploaded on
September 1, 2024
Number of pages
16
Written in
2024/2025
Type
Exam (elaborations)
Contains
Questions & answers

Subjects

Content preview

PHIL 3010 C168 Critical Thinking and Logic latest
Exam 2024 Complete question and answer WGU



Module 1 - What is Critical Thinking?

What is Critical Thinking?
Critical thinking is an intellectual model for understanding issues and forming reasonable and
informed views on them. It embodies a set of reasoning skills that, when properly applied, can
help us determine what we should believe and how we should act.

- Define critical thinking and the key concepts underlying it
- Identify the bad mental habits that commonly impede good thinking
- Outline criteria a skilled critical thinker follows in reasoning through any problem
- Explain weak-sense critical thinking versus strong-sense critical thinking
- Define the essential intellectual traits of a critical thinker
- Implement suggested tactics for improving your thinking.
- Define three basic functions of the mind (thinking, feeling, wanting) and explain their
interrelationship.

Critical thinking is the art of thinking about thinking while thinking in order to make thinking
better.

Critical thinking comprises three interlinking dimension:
1. Analyze one’s own thinking - breaking it down into its component parts.
2. Evaluate one’s own thinking - identifying its weaknesses while recognizing its
strengths.
3. Improving one’s own thinking - reconstructing it to make it better.

Impediments to sound thinking include bad habits:
- making generalizations unsupported by evidence
- letting a stereotype shape our thinking
- viewing the world from one fixed vantage point
- forming false beliefs
- dismissing or attacking viewpoints that conflict with our own
- thinking deceptively about our own experiences

Critical thinking is characteristically:
- self-directed
- self-disciplined
- self-monitored
- self-corrective

,Critical thinking demands a commitment to surmounting two barriers native to everyone:
- egocentrism - the tendency to view everything in relationship to oneself

, - sociocentrism - the assumption that one’s own social group is inherently superior to all
others

First order thinking
- spontaneous and non-reflective
- contains insight, prejudice, good and bad reasoning
- indiscriminately combined

Second order thinking
- first order thinking that is consciously realized (analyzed, assessed, and reconstructed)

Weak-sense critical thinking
- ignore the flaws in their own thinking
- often seek to win an argument through intellectual trickery or deceit
- lacks higher-level skills and values of critical thinking
- makes no good faith effort to consider alternative viewpoints
- lacks fair-mindedness
- employ lower-level rhetorical skills
- employ emotionalism and intellectual trickery
- hide or distort evidence

Strong-sense critical thinking
- defined by a consistent pursuit of what is intellectually fair and just
- strive to be ethical, empathize with others’ viewpoints
- will entertain arguments with which they do not agree
- change their views when confronted with superior reasoning
- employ their thinking reasonably rather than manipulatively
- requires fair-mindedness combined with learning basic critical thinking skills

Fair-mindedness is to bring an unbiased and unprejudiced perspective to all viewpoints
relevant to a situation.

intellectual unfairness feels no responsibility to represent viewpoints with which they disagree
fairly and accurately.



Characterization It’s Opposite

Intellectual Humility - commitment to Intellectual arrogance - overestimation of
discovering the extent of one’s own ignorance how much one knows
on any issue

Intellectual courage - confronting ideas, Intellectual cowardice - fear of ideas that do

Get to know the seller

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
TOPPERSEXAM Chamberlain College Of Nursing
Follow You need to be logged in order to follow users or courses
Sold
17
Member since
2 year
Number of followers
6
Documents
196
Last sold
5 months ago

3,4

5 reviews

5
0
4
2
3
3
2
0
1
0

Recently viewed by you

Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their exams and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can immediately select a different document that better matches what you need.

Pay how you prefer, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card or EFT and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Frequently asked questions