SUS1501
ASSIGNMENT 2
SEMESTER 2
ANSWERS 2024
, Assessment :2
1. Express your proposed go about as a proverb: "van Dijk will take ZAR 1.9 billion (A)
when he's gone about a year's responsibilities (C) to get ridiculously rich (E)."
2. Reaffirm this adage as a universal rule: "To get really, really rich, all people (7.6
billion of them) will take ZAR 1.9 billion after working for a year."
3. Find out if your proverb is possible in a world controlled by the widespread
regulation; lastly No the saying isn't viewed as by the general on the grounds that the
poor stay poor, while the more extravagant become very rich in the event that we have
one individual getting a compensation ,motivation of 1.9 billion and vested share
choice and he is existing in country where a neediness line of food deficiency and
necessities then thought of saying is none.
4. Consider whether you would act rationally in accordance with your maxim in such a
setting. No, I wouldn't be so rational, but people like Bob Dijk put in a lot of effort to get
what they have. According to https://cepr.org/voxeu/columns/taxing-wealth-context-
extreme-inequality-legacy-case-south- africa, it is established that 10% of the
population of South Africa owns more than 85% of the household's assets, and half of
the population has more liabilities than assets. Step:2 Answer the following questions
based on your analysis above:
1. What would probably Kant have said about van Dijk's ZAR 1.9 billion earnings?
(You might want to investigate the nature of van Dijk's earnings in 2018 and 2019 a
little bit.) Kank was a very moral person who knew the right way to do things, but he
wouldn't even consider it.
2. Why do you feel this way? He'll also think that Bob Dijk deserves the billions
ASSIGNMENT 2
SEMESTER 2
ANSWERS 2024
, Assessment :2
1. Express your proposed go about as a proverb: "van Dijk will take ZAR 1.9 billion (A)
when he's gone about a year's responsibilities (C) to get ridiculously rich (E)."
2. Reaffirm this adage as a universal rule: "To get really, really rich, all people (7.6
billion of them) will take ZAR 1.9 billion after working for a year."
3. Find out if your proverb is possible in a world controlled by the widespread
regulation; lastly No the saying isn't viewed as by the general on the grounds that the
poor stay poor, while the more extravagant become very rich in the event that we have
one individual getting a compensation ,motivation of 1.9 billion and vested share
choice and he is existing in country where a neediness line of food deficiency and
necessities then thought of saying is none.
4. Consider whether you would act rationally in accordance with your maxim in such a
setting. No, I wouldn't be so rational, but people like Bob Dijk put in a lot of effort to get
what they have. According to https://cepr.org/voxeu/columns/taxing-wealth-context-
extreme-inequality-legacy-case-south- africa, it is established that 10% of the
population of South Africa owns more than 85% of the household's assets, and half of
the population has more liabilities than assets. Step:2 Answer the following questions
based on your analysis above:
1. What would probably Kant have said about van Dijk's ZAR 1.9 billion earnings?
(You might want to investigate the nature of van Dijk's earnings in 2018 and 2019 a
little bit.) Kank was a very moral person who knew the right way to do things, but he
wouldn't even consider it.
2. Why do you feel this way? He'll also think that Bob Dijk deserves the billions
