Exam questions for London + Rio case studies with high ratings

patterns of suburbanisation differ vastly between LIC and HIC cities. To what extent do you agree with this statement? - comparison - ANSWER-similarities: -some suburbs close to city = wealthier suburbs in both cities, e.g Rio's richest = close to CBD differences: -London = fairly affluent, v accessible = -caught in suburban limbo, often found in Zones 2/3 = too quick into central on tube to be suburb (by OG def) -Rio = some middle class BUT also favelas (poor locations) patterns of suburbanisation differ vastly between LIC and HIC cities. To what extent do you agree with this statement? - marking - ANSWER-ition of suburbanisation - A01 nation of how suburbanisation can be different in LICs and HICs - A02 fic examples - Rio & London - A01 4.Rio - Favelas + middle class suburbs (Complexo do Alemao, Barra de Tijuca, Niteroi) - A01 London - Mainly affluent & middle class areas - Hampstead Garden Suburb, Crouch End, Greenwich or Teddington - A01 les of specific details in the patterns of suburbanisation - A01 e.g, Rio: favelas in poor locations, suburbs in more accessible areas ON OTHER HAND London: suburbs over 5 miles from CBD, very accessible, fairly affluent = differing accessibility levels in different reasons for suburbanisation - A02 to what extent do you agree that pollution + pollution management in these cities is similar? (20 marks) - ANSWER-similarities (pollution): -high levels - both on list of 100 most congested cities (top 25) -problems w/ health = high amount of deaths (5,400 died Rio 2014 due to related causes, 9,000 London) differences (pollution):