100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached 4.2 TrustPilot
logo-home
Summary

Summary All reading materials Methodology Knowledge Quizes

Rating
-
Sold
3
Pages
67
Uploaded on
08-12-2018
Written in
2018/2019

This summary contains all the reading materials for the premaster CIS course 'Methodology for Premaster CIS'. This means the textbook AND all the articles. NB: This is more than you need to learn for the final exam. Though, you need to learn all of this for the in-between knowledge quizzes! If you are looking for a summary of the materials you need for the final exam only, check my page for the other summary or buy the bundle with both included.

Show more Read less
Institution
Course













Whoops! We can’t load your doc right now. Try again or contact support.

Connected book

Written for

Institution
Study
Course

Document information

Summarized whole book?
No
Which chapters are summarized?
Chapter 1- chapter 5 and chapter 8 - chapter 12
Uploaded on
December 8, 2018
File latest updated on
December 12, 2018
Number of pages
67
Written in
2018/2019
Type
Summary

Subjects

Content preview

Methodology for Premaster CIS
SUMMARY

Content
Week 1/2 4
Textbook Chapter 1 4
Basic assumptions 4
Some research possibilities 4
A series of unavoidable decisions 5
Problem-posing, problem-solving and peer persuasion 6
Textbook Chapter 2 6
Hypotheses 7
Questions 8
Mui et al (2016) 9
Week 3 12
Holleman et al. (2016) 12
Week 4 14
Textbook chapter 3 14
Ethics in communication research 14
Some classic ethical positions 14
Contemporary codes of ethics 15
Researcher-Participant Relationships 15
The grey area of the internet 16
Kramer et al. (2014) 17
Week 5 19
Textbook Chapter 4 19
Scholarly journals 19
Scholarly, popular and trade publications 19
Primary versus secondary sources 19
Getting good sources 20
Mr Boole 20
Reviewing the literature 20

, 2

Bartels & Reinders (2010) 21
Week 6 23
Textbook chapter 10 23
Field experiments and ex-post facto designs 23
Experimental designs 23
Between-subjects and a within-subjects design 25
Validity 25
Van Amelsvoort & Schilperoord 26
Week 7 29
Textbook Chapter 5 29
Types of measurements 29
Reliability and validity 30
Reliability 30
Validity 31
Two common measurement scales 31
Vanden Abeele et al. (2018) 32
Week 9 35
Textbook Chapter 8 35
Sampling methods 35
Advantages and disadvantages of sampling methods 36
Sample size 37
Issues with sampling frames 37
Behrend et al. (2011) 38
Week 10 40
Textbook Chapter 9 40
Advantages and disadvantages of surveys 40
Types of Surveys 40
Types of survey questions 41
Survey wording 42
Advantages and disadvantages of online surveys 43
Improving survey response rates 43
Pollmann & Finkenauer (2009) 45
Week 11 47



Marit Kamp Stuvia ©

, 3

Textbook Chapter 11 (part 1) 47
Qualitative and quantitative research: similarities and differences 47
Decisions to make in qualitative research 47
Interviews 48
Broeder & Kistemaker (2015) 49
Week 12 52
Textbook Chapter 11 (part 2) 52
Focus groups 52
Ethnographic methods 53
Observational studies 54
Unobtrusive measures 55
Conversation analysis 55
Making sense of qualitative data 55
Zwaanswijk et al. (2007) 56
Week 13 58
Textbook Chapter 12 58
Content analysis 58
Content analysis software 59
Mahrt & Scharkow (2013) 60
Week 14 61
Farrel & Lewandowsky (2015) 61
Week 15 65
Munafò et al. (2017) 65




Marit Kamp Stuvia ©

, 4


Week 1/2
Textbook Chapter 1
GETTING STARTED: POSSIBILITIES AND DECISIONS

Basic assumptions
There are several basic assumptions that underpin all communication research methods.
- Observations capture/do not capture an underlying reality.
Attitudes can’t be seen, but the underlying behaviour tells us something about
someone’s attitude. The concept of attitude provides, therefore, a useful tool for
thinking about communication processes.
- Theories about human behaviour can/cannot be generalized.
Researchers using survey or experimental methods want to assume that the results of
their research will apply to people who are similar to the study participants. Not all
people can be generalized, but it can help with an experiment to do so sometimes.
- Researchers should/should not distance themselves from their research
participants.
When distancing themselves, researchers become more objective but will miss some
important insights. On the other hand, getting closer to the participants will maybe
influence them or the researcher him/herself.
- Research should/should not be done for a specific purpose.
If the purpose of your research is to simply answer a question or solving a problem of
society it is fine. However, some researchers do research that is funded by a
corporation or foundation. The researcher is instructed to get specific answers to the
questions given as quickly as possible. This will possibly influence the research
process.
- There is/is not one best position from which to observe human behaviour.
Researchers will typically find one of the several components present in their research
more interesting than others and will give that component priority in their
investigations. So yes, it is possible, but it never happens.


Some research possibilities
Two characteristics of scientific research methods are:
1. Observation or empiricism.
2. The attempt to rule out alternative explanations.

There are different ways in which research can be done:
- Observation
- Setting up surveys or focus groups
- Critical content analysis
- Interviewing




Marit Kamp Stuvia ©

, 5

The different research methods look at different aspects of human communication, which
consists of five major components:
1. Source
The provider or initiator of content.
➔ With interviews.
2. Message(s)
The content of the communication.
➔ With content analysis.
3. Channel or medium
The vehicle for communication content (example: social media)
4. Receiver(s)
The recipients or consumers of information.
➔ With observation, surveys or a focus group.
5. Noise
Extraneous information or distractions that can disrupt an interaction.


A series of unavoidable decisions
Human communication is very complex. For this reason, researchers focus only on parts of
this totality. They make decisions in what they do and do not want to investigate.
- Wide or narrow.
Communication scholars typically divide communication studies into a number of
specific interest areas in order to get a clear view of the research area as well as giving
a possibility to narrow down your research topic.
- Dispassionate or involved.
One sees research as a personal quest for knowledge, the other as an engaged
contribution to society (called action research).
- Objective or subjective.
Social scientists try to be as objective as possible while by contrast phenomenologists
and ethnographers try to understand people’s subjective worlds.
- Your questions or their answers.
You can decide to get answers to specific questions you have or elicit people’s views
in their own language, not quite knowing what you get.
- Quantitative or qualitative
Some research questions can be answered with numbers and ask for a quantitative
research method, while other questions (about the human motivation for example) ask
for a qualitative research method. A combination of both methods is called a
triangulation. Q-methodology is a form of triangulation. Quantitative data check the
qualitative data.




Marit Kamp Stuvia ©

, 6


Problem-posing, problem-solving and peer persuasion
Communication research can be regarded as having three main components:
1. Problem-posing
To do research you have to decide what the question.
Corresponding questions: What question and why this question? (chapter 2)
2. Problem-solving
Now you need to answer this question.
Corresponding questions: How do I answer this question? (chapter 2)
3. Peer persuasion
After that, you need to let the world know about your research by publishing it.



In summary
Lecture
[text]● Communication research is a systematic process of posing questions about human
communication, designing and implementing research that will answer those
questions, and then persuading other researchers that your results are valid.
● Communication researchers typically specialize in one aspect of communication.
● Researchers may use qualitative methods, quantitative methods, or both.
● Researchers have empirical, interpretive, or critical perspectives on
communication.



Textbook Chapter 2
FIRST DECISIONS: WHAT, WHY, HOW?
Chapter two will continue where chapter one finished. It will answer the questions: what
research question do I need? Why do I need this research question? And how am I going to
answer this question?


The “what” question
Scientists move between theory and observation when they are formulating a research
question. Three thought processes that link theory and observation are induction, deduction,
and abduction.
- Induction
Reasoning from observations to a theory that might explain your observations. After
generating several theories, you chose one theory that offers the best explanation of
the observations done.
- Deduction
Reasoning from a theory to define observations you will make to test the theory.
Deduction is in a sense more efficient than induction because it leads to a specific
observation that will test your hypothesis.
- Abduction
Reasoning from an effect to possible causes.


Marit Kamp Stuvia ©

Get to know the seller

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
maritkamp Tilburg University
Follow You need to be logged in order to follow users or courses
Sold
472
Member since
9 year
Number of followers
294
Documents
9
Last sold
2 weeks ago
Muziekwetenschap (UU) en communicatiewetenschappen (UvT; New Media Design + pre-master)

Hoe lang ik al samenvattingen maak? Volgens mij begon dat op de basisschool al. Gelukkig wist ik toen nog niet dat je daar geld voor kon vragen :') Dit is begonnen aan het eind van de middelbare school toen medeleerlingen geen boeken meer lazen omdat ze wisten dat ik een samenvatting ging maken. Toen besloot ik dat voor het werk dat ik doe voor een ander ik best een bijdrage mag vragen. Samenvattingen voor een mooie lage prijs van gemiddeld vijf euro! Let wel op: Sommige samenvattingen zijn al wat ouder. Check dus goed of de samenvatting nog voldoet aan de eisen van je tentamen. Dan rest mij nog één ding: Succes met leren!

Read more Read less
3,9

98 reviews

5
31
4
41
3
12
2
9
1
5

Recently viewed by you

Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their exams and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can immediately select a different document that better matches what you need.

Pay how you prefer, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card or EFT and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Frequently asked questions