100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached 4,6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Exam (elaborations)

LML4807 Assignment 1 Semester 2 2023 - DUE 22 August 2023

Rating
-
Sold
-
Pages
10
Grade
A+
Uploaded on
02-08-2023
Written in
2023/2024

LML4807 Assignment 1 (COMPLETE ANSWERS) Semester 2 2023 - DUE 22 August 2023 100% TRUSTED workings with detailed Answers for A+ Grade.










Whoops! We can’t load your doc right now. Try again or contact support.

Document information

Uploaded on
August 2, 2023
Number of pages
10
Written in
2023/2024
Type
Exam (elaborations)
Contains
Questions & answers

Subjects

Content preview

LML4807
ASSIGNMENT 1 SEMESTER 2 2023

, Carefully read the case below, from your prescribed reading list, and
answer the following questions:


Joint Stock v Absa Bank 2008 (4) SA 287 (SCA) The allocation of marks for
this case discussion is as follows:




SUMMARY

Summary of the Case "Joint Stock v Absa Bank 2008 (4) SA 287 (SCA)":

In this South African case, Joint Stock, the appellant, claimed ownership of
funds held in account 1313 with Absa Bank. The funds were deposited by
Joint Stock for a specific purpose, to pay subcontractors in a construction
project known as the Varvarinskoye project (VP) in Kazakhstan.

The account was held in the name of the sixth respondent, who was the
nominated account holder for the VP project. Absa Bank, the respondent,
claimed the right to set off the funds against debts owed to it by other parties,
including Joint Stock.

The court addressed the issue of whether Absa Bank's ownership of the funds
in the account prevented Joint Stock from asserting its claim to the money.
The court rejected the notion that ownership by the bank necessarily
precluded a legitimate claim by another party.

The court referred to previous cases where it was established that the account
holder might not necessarily have a proprietary right to the funds held in the
account. The critical question was whether the terms of the agreement
between the parties conferred any title on the account holder (sixth
respondent) to the funds.

It was found that the account was opened and operated on behalf of Joint
Stock for the specific purpose of warehousing the funds until payment to
subcontractors was authorized. The account holder, the sixth respondent, had
no personal claim to the money, and MDM (the company responsible for the
VP project) did not have the authority to withdraw the funds without Joint
Stock's authorization.

Get to know the seller

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
StudyStore Chamberlain College Of Nursing
View profile
Follow You need to be logged in order to follow users or courses
Sold
71
Member since
2 year
Number of followers
65
Documents
281
Last sold
8 months ago
Study Store

On this page, you find all documents, package deals, and flashcards offered by seller Study Store

3,3

9 reviews

5
1
4
3
3
4
2
0
1
1

Recently viewed by you

Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their exams and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can immediately select a different document that better matches what you need.

Pay how you prefer, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card or EFT and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Frequently asked questions