100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached 4.2 TrustPilot
logo-home
Summary

Summary lectures HNE-30506

Rating
3,0
(2)
Sold
2
Pages
32
Uploaded on
17-10-2016
Written in
2016/2017

Complete summary of the lectures written in the form of questions. For questions or if something is unclear, feel free to contact me. Note: pictures may not be shown in the example, but they are really there! :)

Institution
Course










Whoops! We can’t load your doc right now. Try again or contact support.

Written for

Institution
Study
Course

Document information

Uploaded on
October 17, 2016
File latest updated on
October 17, 2016
Number of pages
32
Written in
2016/2017
Type
Summary

Subjects

Content preview

Summary Principles of Sensory Science
Lecture 2: Selection and Training of Sensory Panels
- Chapter 3 – Principles of good practice; 3.5 Panellist consideration.
After the lecture the student is expected to:
- Know how to select assessors for sensory panels for different purposes
- Understand the role of the panel leader for the success of sensory projects
- Know different manners of attribute generation
- Be able to generate sensory attributes for the QDA in this course
- Understand and be able to explain how different methods of descriptive analysis require different
degrees of training
- Know and be able to apply the methods of consensus training and individual vocabularies

Why select sensory subjects?
→ Find all the nuances that can be detected e.g. intensity.

How to select sensory subjects?
→ Recruitment of analytical sensory panels (repeatable and precise):
- Internal or external
- Age 20-55 (senses are stable)
- Test about twice the number of subjects needed
- Announcement… media, canteen, class, etc.
→ Panel selection by questionnaire:
- Personality: Be able to work in a team; ”Cosmopolitan” preferences; Positive not over-
bearing; Good listener and communicator; Committed and flexible.
- Health: General good health condition; Documentation of any health restrictions
(medication, allergies, pregnancy, false teeth, …)
- Availability
→ Panel selection by tests for sensory ability
Example of a rapid taste
test is papers dipped in
different concentrations
to test if you taste the
basic taste.
Rapid odour test Sniffin’
sticks:




How to train sensory subjects?/ When is the panel trained enough?
→ General training: familiarisation with test protocols, discrimination tests, intensity scaling
→ Product specific training: describe what the different properties are, especially important for
descriptive analysis.
→ Attribute specific training: making concepts cognitive clear (=understandable) to the sensory panel

,Selection and training of subjects needed for descriptive, not for threshold and discrimination:




Check performance over time?
→ Monitoring of performance of analytical sensory panels
- Inter individual variation (between individuals)
- Intra individual variation (within individual)
- Sequential analysis – long-term performance
- Feedback on performance to individual or panel

What are the roles and personal characteristics of a panel leader?
→ Type of roles (depending on the method)
- Passive facilitator (e.g. QDA)
- Directive leader (e.g. Spectrum)
→Personal characteristics
- Non-judgemental/opinionated
- Sensitive and assertive, but diplomatic
- Leading panel discussions but active listener
- Recognises and guards against moderator bias
- Ability to motivate panel


Lecture 1: Descriptive Sensory Analysis
- Chapter 10 – Descriptive analysis
After the lecture the student is expected to:
- Know the principles of methods such as mapping, napping, Flash Profile and their field of application

What is descriptive sensory analysis?
- A method aiming to provide a quantitative measure of the sensory properties for a set of
products
- A number of different approaches
o Trademarks (QDA and Spectrum)
o Speed versus accuracy (accuracy not good with rapid methods; training panel for a
long time gives a food accuracy, find a lot of details)
o Relations to instrumental measures (perception of sourness and ph value in milk; if
correlated that replacement of sensory panel by instrument)

, Why using descriptive sensory analysis?
- Product reformulations
- New product development
- Quality control
o Acceptability to specified target
o Calibration of instrumental methods
- Brand mapping (e.g. identifying sensory niches)
- Consumer preference mapping
- Research
o Understanding relationships between product/process/production properties and
perceptible properties

What are the main differences between methods?
- Generation of sensory descriptors
- Degree of subject training
- Use of reference materials and scaling




What is the flavor profile method?
- Consensus method (4-6 judges; 2-3 weeks training)
- A qualitative descriptive method – no statistical analysis possible due to consensus scores
- Reference materials for discussing and defining
- Limited to flavour impressions
- Estimate intensity of flavour attributes (aroma, flavour, mouth feel and aftertaste). Expand
with - + ½ ↑ ↓




- Estimate intensity of overall amplitude (overall balance and blending of product):

What is the Quantitative Descriptive Analysis?
- Data from individual panel members (n=10-12) in sensory booths
- Concensus wrt. attribute generation and use
- Reference standards used only occasionally
- A 6 inch (15.2 cm) continuous line used for measuring intensity (psychological research)
- All kinds of sensory attributes
- Selection of attributes for all modalities or fewer
- Risk for perceptual dumping considered in attribute selection – include e.g. ”other
impressions”
- Panel leader is passive member in selecting attributes; facilitates the process
→ Many variations on this method but should not be called QDA!
R71,22
Get access to the full document:

100% satisfaction guarantee
Immediately available after payment
Both online and in PDF
No strings attached


Document also available in package deal

Reviews from verified buyers

Showing all 2 reviews
7 year ago

8 year ago

Mostly literally the slides are below each other and little additional information about what it means / examples from the college

3,0

2 reviews

5
0
4
0
3
2
2
0
1
0
Trustworthy reviews on Stuvia

All reviews are made by real Stuvia users after verified purchases.

Get to know the seller

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
Inge-Sofie Wageningen University
Follow You need to be logged in order to follow users or courses
Sold
126
Member since
11 year
Number of followers
97
Documents
25
Last sold
1 year ago

3,8

24 reviews

5
8
4
7
3
6
2
2
1
1

Recently viewed by you

Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their exams and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can immediately select a different document that better matches what you need.

Pay how you prefer, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card or EFT and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Frequently asked questions