100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached 4.2 TrustPilot
logo-home
Summary

SaM summary: lectures and workgroups

Rating
4,0
(2)
Sold
13
Pages
50
Uploaded on
22-03-2023
Written in
2022/2023

This summary is in english, it contains summary of all the lectures and also workgroups. there are pictures both from lectures and from SPSS as an example on how to run some specific analyses.

Institution
Course











Whoops! We can’t load your doc right now. Try again or contact support.

Written for

Institution
Study
Course

Document information

Uploaded on
March 22, 2023
Number of pages
50
Written in
2022/2023
Type
Summary

Subjects

Content preview

Statistics and Methodology
1 - RECAP
Null hypothesis testing

 Two-sided hypothesis
o H0: no effect/no difference
o Ha: an effect/ a difference
 One-sided hypothesis: when one direction is biologically/physically impossible, or we want to test
specific threshold
o H0: smaller than (or larger than)
o Ha: larger than or equal to (or smaller than or equal to)
 We can only reject/retain the H0
 Statistics tell you whether an observed relationship between X and Y in your sample is likely to reflect a
TRUE relationship in the (unobserved) population



Research question

 P  population: humans, animals
 I  intervention: treatment, experimental condition
 C  comparison: to what you want to compare this?
 O  outcome: what are you measuring?
 S  study design (determines causality: not the statistics)
o Experimental
 Allows causal inference and manipulation
 When I change X, how does Y change?
o Observational
 No causal inference
 How do different levels of X correspond to different levels of Y?



Levels of measurements
 Categorical
o Nominal: category without logical order
 Dichotomous if limited to two categories e.g. sex m/f, color blue vs. red
 Non-dichotomous when e.g. favorite color in general
o Ordinal: category with a specific order or rank
 Race position, height rank, lung function (bad, good, excellent)
 Best represented via boxplot
 Quantitative (units)
o Discrete: counts, finite values
 Countable e.g. number of coughs
 5, 4, 3, 99
o Continuous: scale variable with infinite values
 Measurable e.g. lung volume in liters, weight of the package
 3.2, 5.667, 12.347

P-value
 Probability of the data given that the null hypothesis is true
 Very unlikely (p less than α 0.05)  reject the H0, non-significant result




1

,Errors

 Probability implies uncertainty  errors possible!
 Type I error: if the H0 is rejected while in reality the H0 is true
 Type II error: if the H0 is retained while in reality the H0 is false
 If type I error is increasing type II error will decrease and vice versa




Confidence intervals (CI)

 95% CI
o If we sample a large number of times, and compute the CI for each sample, 95% of CIs would
contain the true population parameter
o We are 95% confident that the population parameter lies within the CI
 The CI conclusion doesnt change no matter whether we reject or retain the H0
 Narrower CI  estimate is more precise
 One sample t-test
o 𝜇 = value
o If H0 is rejected we conclude:
 The mean under the H0 (𝜇) does not lie within the CI around the sample mean
 And we are 95% confident that the population mean 𝜇 lies within the CI around the
sample mean
 Two samples t-test
o 𝜇𝑋 = 𝜇𝑌 i.e. 𝜇𝑋 – 𝜇𝑌 = 0
o If H0 is rejected we conclude:


2

,  The difference in means under the H0 (𝜇𝑋 – 𝜇𝑌) does not lie within the CI around the
mean difference in the sample
 And we are 95% confident that the difference in population means (𝜇𝑋 – 𝜇 𝑌) lies within
the CI around the mean difference in the sample



Correlation

 To which extent do two variables tend to change together or ‘co-vary’
o Shows only degree of association but no direction of effect
 Pearson's correlation: the correspondence between the actual data
 Spearman's rho: the correspondence between the ranks
 Graph: scatter plot, sensitive to outliers
 Quantification (measurement of the quantity of something): correlation coefficient (r or ρ)
o -1 to 1 (negative to positive relationship)
o Measure of linear association
 Hypothesis
o H0: 𝜌 = 0, X and Y are not correlated
o H1: 𝜌 ≠ 0, X and Y are correlated
 Conclusion: X and Y are strongly correlated (covariation is not causal)



Regression

 Regression shows direction of effect (does not imply causality)
o For each value of X (IV) prediction of Y (DV)
 Y = a + b*X + 
o b  regression coefficient which predicts change in Y if X increases one scale unit



WORKGROUP 1
Data view  presents actual data as can be presented in excel
Variable view  variables are further defined and specified



Descriptive statistics

SPSS: Analyze  descriptive statistic  descriptives

 In the options you can adjust what descriptives do you want (mean, range, min, max etc.)




SPSS: Analyze  descriptive statistic  frequencies

 Can give insight into proportions




3

, Example on hypothesis testing: one sample t-test

According to the central bureau of statistics, the mean BMI of people in the Netherlands, in 2011 was 25.3.
Investigate whether the mean BMI in this sample is representative for people in the Netherlands in 2011.

 H0: Mean BMI in the Netherlands in 2011 is 25.3  μ = 25.3
 H1: Mean BMI in the Netherlands in 2011 is not 25.3  μ ≠ 25.3



Q1. Which probability distribution and statistical test is necessary to evaluate the evidence?

A one-sample t-test is appropriate because we have one sample in the data, for which we want to test whether
the mean (in the population from which the sample was taken) is equal to a given (or known) population mean.
Given the continuous nature of the outcome variable (BMI), and the unknown mean and variance in the
population, a t-distribution with 512-1 = 511 degrees of freedom is appropriate.




SPSS: Analyze  compare means and proportions  one sample t-test

The “test value” must be set to the given population mean i.e. in this case 25.3




Q2. You find the CI to be [26.59, 27.22] (calculated by hand). What is the interpretation of this CI?

If we were to repeat this experiment a large number of times, and compute the CI for each experiment, 95% of
them would contain the true mean of the population. For this reason we are 95% confident that interval [26.59,
27.22] may contain the true mean of the population.



Q3. The CI calculated by hand and the CI in the SPSS output do not match. Why is that?

This is because SPSS first computed the difference between the sample mean and the population mean. Around
the mean of this difference, a CI was computed.



Q4. Make a conclusion on whether to retain or reject the H0.

The t = 9.995 with p-value of <0.01 (df = 511) indicates that the result is non-significant meaning we will reject
our H0. The same can be concluded by looking at the CI [26.59, 27.22]. Under the H0 the difference between the
sample mean and the population mean is 0, so the expected value under the H0 (0) is not part of the CI, leading
thus to the same conclusion to reject the H0.



Q5. What assumptions come with this test?

Most important assumtions are „simple random sample“ and „normality“ assumption. „Simple random sample“
refers to the assumtion that all observations are independent. „Normality“ refers to the assumtion that the
outcome variable is a sample drawn from the population which follows a normal distirbution.

4

Reviews from verified buyers

Showing all 2 reviews
1 year ago

1 year ago

4,0

2 reviews

5
0
4
2
3
0
2
0
1
0
Trustworthy reviews on Stuvia

All reviews are made by real Stuvia users after verified purchases.

Get to know the seller

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
JoškoBasica Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Follow You need to be logged in order to follow users or courses
Sold
17
Member since
3 year
Number of followers
15
Documents
5
Last sold
8 months ago

4,0

2 reviews

5
0
4
2
3
0
2
0
1
0

Recently viewed by you

Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their exams and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can immediately select a different document that better matches what you need.

Pay how you prefer, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card or EFT and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Frequently asked questions