Written by students who passed Immediately available after payment Read online or as PDF Wrong document? Swap it for free 4,6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Document preview thumbnail
Preview 2 out of 13 pages
Exam (elaborations)

CPR3701 Assignment 02 Feedback

Document preview thumbnail
Preview 2 out of 13 pages

CPR3701 Assignment 02 Feedback Question 01 I. Discuss the Circumstances under which an error in a charge sheet may be corrected. Section 86 allows for the amendment of charge sheets that are defective: Where it is defective for want of an essential element; where there is material difference between the allegation in the charge sheet and the evidence that has been led, where words have been omitted or unnecessarily inserted or any other error is made. Court may order an amendment only if it considers that the making of the amendment will not prejudice the accused in his defence. There won’t be prejudice if there is only a slight variance or where it is clear that the defence would have remained exactly the same had the state originally presented the charge in the amended form. Where application to amend the charge is made on appeal the court must be satisfied that the defence would have remained the same if the charge had originally contained the necessary particulars. On appeal the court would accede to an application for the amendment of a charge only if it were satisfied that there was no reasonable doubt that the appellant would not be prejudiced which will depend upon the facts and circumstances of each case. Section 86 makes provision for the amendment of the charge and not replacement thereof by an altogether new charge. If the proposed amendment doesn’t correspond at all to the original charge, then we talk of substitution and not amendment. Should a new charge be framed in the course of a trial, the possibility of prejudice to the accused is strong as he comes to court prepared to meet a particular charge and now will be faced with a different issue. Section 86(4) provides that the fact that the charge is not amended doesn’t affect the validity of the proceedings, unless the court has refused to allow the amendment. If the failure to amend would not have prejudiced the accused in his defence, the failure to effect the amendment will not invalidate the proceedings. Because 2 Section 88 allows for defects to be cured by evidence, the need for amendments has largely fallen away, except where the want of an essential averment was brought to the notice of the court in which case the automatic cure in s88 does not become operative and the change will have to be amended.

Content preview

CPR3701
Assignment
02 Feedback

, Question 01

I. Discuss the Circumstances under which an error in a charge sheet may be
corrected.

Section 86 allows for the amendment of charge sheets that are defective:
Where it is defective for want of an essential element; where there is material
difference between the allegation in the charge sheet and the evidence that has
been led, where words have been omitted or unnecessarily inserted or any other
error is made.


Court may order an amendment only if it considers that the making of the
amendment will not prejudice the accused in his defence. There won’t be
prejudice if there is only a slight variance or where it is clear that the defence
would have remained exactly the same had the state originally presented the
charge in the amended form. Where application to amend the charge is made on
appeal the court must be satisfied that the defence would have remained the
same if the charge had originally contained the necessary particulars. On appeal
the court would accede to an application for the amendment of a charge only if it
were satisfied that there was no reasonable doubt that the appellant would not be
prejudiced which will depend upon the facts and circumstances of each case.


Section 86 makes provision for the amendment of the charge and not
replacement thereof by an altogether new charge. If the proposed amendment
doesn’t correspond at all to the original charge, then we talk of substitution and
not amendment. Should a new charge be framed in the course of a trial, the
possibility of prejudice to the accused is strong as he comes to court prepared to
meet a particular charge and now will be faced with a different issue. Section
86(4) provides that the fact that the charge is not amended doesn’t affect the
validity of the proceedings, unless the court has refused to allow the amendment.
If the failure to amend would not have prejudiced the accused in his defence, the
failure to effect the amendment will not invalidate the proceedings. Because


2

Document information

Uploaded on
October 23, 2022
Number of pages
13
Written in
2022/2023
Type
Exam (elaborations)
Contains
Questions & answers
R48,95

Wrong document? Swap it for free Within 14 days of purchase and before downloading, you can choose a different document. You can simply spend the amount again.
Written by students who passed
Immediately available after payment
Read online or as PDF

Sold
0
Followers
0
Items
12
Last sold
-


Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their exams and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can immediately select a different document that better matches what you need.

Pay how you prefer, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card or EFT and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Working on your references?

Create accurate citations in APA, MLA and Harvard with our free citation generator.

Working on your references?

Frequently asked questions