Written by students who passed Immediately available after payment Read online or as PDF Wrong document? Swap it for free 4,6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Summary

Summary Private nuisance

Rating
-
Sold
6
Pages
2
Uploaded on
08-02-2016
Written in
2014/2015

An overview of private nuisance

Institution
Course

Content preview

OVERVIEW OF PRIVATE NUISANCE
 Definition:
 An unlawful, substantial and unreasonable interference with a person’s
use, comfort, enjoyment and any interest that a person may have over his
land. (definition of private nuisance from the case of Read v Lyons & Co
Ltd [1945]
 3 kinds of interest are therefore protected:
 The plaintiff’s interest over the land per se
 The use and enjoyment of land
 These interests may be interfered with at one time
 Elements of Private Nuisance
 Indirect interference with the use or enjoyment of land
 Substantial
 Unreasonableness
 Damage has been suffered
 Indirect physical damage to the property
 By causing personal discomfort (loss of amenity)
 Establishing Private Nuisance
 Substantial interference
 Interference with the use, comfort, or enjoyment of land
 Material or physical damage to land or property
 Unreasonableness
 Damage and location of the Plaintiff’s and Defendant’s premises
 Public benefit of the defendant’s activities
 Extraordinary sensitivity on the part of the plaintiff
 Interference must be continuous
 Temporary interference and isolated incident
 Malice
 SUBSTANTIAL INTERFERENCE
 Nuisance is not a tort which is actionable per se.
 The plaintiff must prove that he has suffered damage in order to succeed
in his claim
 What constitutes substantial interference differs according to which of the
recognized types of damage and interference the plaintiff has suffered.
 Interference with the use, comfort, or enjoyment of land.
 Known as amenity nuisance
 They result in the feeling of discomfort whereby one is unable to
live peacefully and comfortably on one’s own land arising from the
defendant’s activity.
 Depends on the facts and circumstances in each case.
 Decisions have to be made on a case by case basis.

English Law cases
Andrea v Selfridge & Co Ltd [1937]
—loss of one night’s sleep due to
excessive noise.
Laws v Florinplace Ltd [1981]—as

Written for

Institution
Study
Course

Document information

Uploaded on
February 8, 2016
Number of pages
2
Written in
2014/2015
Type
SUMMARY

Subjects

Free
Get access to the full document:
Download

Wrong document? Swap it for free Within 14 days of purchase and before downloading, you can choose a different document. You can simply spend the amount again.
Written by students who passed
Immediately available after payment
Read online or as PDF

Get to know the seller
Seller avatar
hema2394

Document also available in package deal

Get to know the seller

Seller avatar
hema2394 The University of Manchester
Follow You need to be logged in order to follow users or courses
Sold
15
Member since
10 year
Number of followers
9
Documents
9
Last sold
4 year ago

0,0

0 reviews

5
0
4
0
3
0
2
0
1
0

Trending documents

Recently viewed by you

Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their exams and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can immediately select a different document that better matches what you need.

Pay how you prefer, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card or EFT and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Frequently asked questions