Written by students who passed Immediately available after payment Read online or as PDF Wrong document? Swap it for free 4,6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Exam (elaborations)

IRM1501 ASSIGNMENT 2 SEMESTER 2:2022 - QUESTIONS & ANSWERS

Rating
5,0
(1)
Sold
4
Pages
8
Grade
A
Uploaded on
26-08-2022
Written in
2022/2023

The answer to Assignment 2 is compiled from transcripts available on YouTube. DO NOT RISK SUMMARIZING THE WRONG CASE AND OBTAIN A ZERO .This document contains the QUESTIONS & ANSWERS to IRM1501 ASSIGNMENT2 SEMESTER 2:2022 It SUMMARISES the case of Amabhungane Centre for Investigative Journalism NPC v President of the Republic of South Africa CCT385/21 (31 May 2022) in the prescribed format with Footnotes and Bibliography included.

Show more Read less

Content preview

2022




IRM1501
Introduction to Research for Law and Criminal
Justice

ASSIGNMENT QUESTION & ANSWERS
SEMESTER 2:2022

ASSIGNMENT TWO
UNIQUE NUMBER: 814487
DUE DATE: 16 September 2022 at 17h00
Opening date for the portal - 2 September 2022 at
08h00




CHRISTINA SHAAKUMENI

,ASSIGNMENT TWO

Find and summarise the case of Amabhungane Centre for Investigative
Journalism NPC v President of the Republic of South Africa CCT385/21
(31 May 2022) in a prescribed format. Your summary must highlight the
facts of the case, the legal question, the reasons for coming to the
conclusion and the findings of the case.

[20 Marks]

, In the case to Assignment 2 judgment has not been handed down. The answer
to Assignment 2 is compiled from transcripts that are available from the video
on YouTube.

CASE SUMMARY

AZS Centre for Investigative Journalism NPC v President of the Republic of South
Africa CCT385/21 (31 May 2022)

Facts of the case

This judgment follows this Court's1 decision in proceedings arising out of the
declaration of invalidity granted by the full bench of the Pretoria High Court 2
regarding the Executive Ethics Code3 and concerning the question of whether there
is sufficient duty of disclosure in respect of donations made to internal party
campaigns. It appears common cause and it seems with respect undoubtedly correct
that the declaration4 of the High Court5 is subject to confirmation by this court
because although regulations are not normally subject to confirmation, the conduct
of the President is. Because of the unfortunate way in which the full bench 6 dealt with
the matter first time round this court was presented with a bifurcated case a debate
about the interpretation on the one hand that's in the Public Protector case and a
debate about the constitutionality in the Amabhungane case and this court
understandably said we're not going to be first and final instance on that second
question.




1
Amabhungane Centre for Investigative Journalism NPC v President of the Republic of South Africa
CCT385/21 (31 May 2022).
2
AmaBhungane Centre for Investigative Journalism NPC v President of the Republic of South Africa
(55578/19) [2021] ZAGPPHC 813; [2022] 1 All SA 706 (GP) (2 December 2021).
3
Executive Ethics Code, 2000.
4
Section 167(5) of the Constitution of South Africa, 1996.
5
AmaBhungane case.
6
Public Protector and Others v President of the Republic of South Africa and Others 2021 (6) SA
27 (CC).

Document information

Uploaded on
August 26, 2022
File latest updated on
September 4, 2022
Number of pages
8
Written in
2022/2023
Type
Exam (elaborations)
Contains
Questions & answers

Subjects

R81,00
Get access to the full document:

Wrong document? Swap it for free Within 14 days of purchase and before downloading, you can choose a different document. You can simply spend the amount again.
Written by students who passed
Immediately available after payment
Read online or as PDF

Reviews from verified buyers

Showing all reviews
3 year ago

Very happy

3 year ago

Hi Vee, I am really happy I could contribute to your happiness. Christina

5,0

1 reviews

5
1
4
0
3
0
2
0
1
0
Trustworthy reviews on Stuvia

All reviews are made by real Stuvia users after verified purchases.

Get to know the seller

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
cristinashaakumeni University of South Africa (Unisa)
View profile
Follow You need to be logged in order to follow users or courses
Sold
32
Member since
4 year
Number of followers
29
Documents
15
Last sold
1 year ago

4,7

3 reviews

5
2
4
1
3
0
2
0
1
0

Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their exams and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can immediately select a different document that better matches what you need.

Pay how you prefer, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card or EFT and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Working on your references?

Create accurate citations in APA, MLA and Harvard with our free citation generator.

Working on your references?

Frequently asked questions