100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached 4.2 TrustPilot
logo-home
Summary

Summary Auditing 288 A1S2 Notes - Ethics, Pre-engagement activities, Knowledge of the business

Rating
4,5
(2)
Sold
8
Pages
23
Uploaded on
16-08-2022
Written in
2022/2023

Auditing 288 A1S2 Notes - Ethics, Pre-engagement activities, Knowledge of the business Good Short and simple summary formatted neatly











Whoops! We can’t load your doc right now. Try again or contact support.

Document information

Uploaded on
August 16, 2022
Number of pages
23
Written in
2022/2023
Type
Summary

Content preview

Auditing Ethics Own Notes



Ethics

• Recap of an Audit:

- Systematic Process
- To gather and evaluate evidence and information objectively to make an evaluation
- Evaluate the assertations about economic actions and situations made by management
- Determine the correlation of assertations both qualitative and quantitative against
predetermined criteria
- Communicate these results in writing to the users of this data

• How does Ethics tie in with SAICA

- All SAICA members are registered after clerkship and exams
- Ethics (Code of Professional Conduct) are what all CA’s are expected to follow, including
accountants working outside SA, based on an international standard.
- IRBA (Independent Regulatory Board of Auditors) sign off on audit reports being conducted, are
all registered auditors and accountants
- Auditing Profession Act
- Code of Professional Conduct Part A and Part B (B is for registered Auditors) all based on
international standards

Ethics

A set of principles of right conduct and a theory or system of moral values




SAICA Code of Professional Conduct

Part 1A – General Application of the Code

• Applicable to all CAs

• Definitions

- Assurance engagement can be an audit or a review engagement or other assurance
engagements where no opinion is expressed
- Direct financial interest is when something is owned, under control of or can influence the
investment decisions
- Indirect financial interest is where an individual has no control and cannot influence investment
decisions
- Contingent fees are fees contingent on a condition
- Immediate family is your spouse or the equivalent
- Close family is your parent, child or sibling

, - Professional services are audits, reviews, tax, advice
- Conflict of interest is something that creates a threat to objectivity and other fundamentals



Conceptual Framework

• Professional Accountants must:

1. Exercise Professional Judgement
- Apply relevant training, knowledge, skill, and experience
- Consider:
- Is information missing?
- Are there inconsistencies between facts, circumstances, and expectations?
- Is the professional accountant’s expertise sufficient?
- Is further consultation required?
- Does the information provide reasonable basis for conclusion?
- Are there any preconceptions or bias?
- Are there any other possible and reasonable conclusions?
2. Remain alert to new information and changes
3. Use the reasonable and informed third party test (RITP)
- Would the same conclusion be reached by a reasonable and informed third party?
- Weigh all relevant facts and circumstances available at the time (or expected to know)
- Third party does not have to be a professional accountant but must have relevant knowledge
- Evaluates the appropriateness of conclusions in an impartial manner

Identify the Threats – Part 1A

Threats to the Fundamental Principles

1. Self-interest

-Financial or other interest to a CA or a family member, the CA stands to benefit from something

2. Self-review

- “Marking your own Homework”

- The CA worked for the client in the previous year and prepared the financial statements and now
works for the auditing firm and must audit them

3. Advocacy

- A CA promotes an opinion or a position to the point where objectivity might be influenced.

- E.g. You testify on behalf of a client in court, you support them to the point where you are no longer
independent or objective towards them

4. Familiarity

, - Close family, business or social relationship could cause a CA to be sympathetic to the interests of
others. E.g. An audit partner being lifelong friends with a client

5. Intimidation

- The CA could be deterred from acting in an objective manner with threats, whether they are actual or
perceived.

- E.g. A boss puts pressure on an employee to manipulate financial statements by threatening to fire
them. A client threatens to walk away from the auditing firm if the auditors do not give an unqualified
opinion

- Evaluate the significance of the threat by using qualitative and quantitative factors




The Fundamental Principles – Part 1B

• Integrity

- Straight forward and honest in all professional relationships
- Fair dealing and truthfulness
- Not be associated with and does not sign off on – materially false/misleading statements,
recklessly furnished material, omissions that could be misleading, CA(SA) may not be associated
with any of these

• Objectivity

- Do not compromise business judgement due to bias, conflict of interest or undue influences

• Professional Competence and Due Care

- Required to maintain professional knowledge required to render competent professional
services
- Act diligently and professionally in accordance with the applicable standards
- Professional Competence involves attainment, process where you attain the title of a CA(SA),
and maintenance such as training and updates programs.
- Diligence, act in accordance with the requirements of an assignment, thoroughly, carefully, in a
timely manner. Ensure subordinates have the appropriate training and supervision.
- Inform clients of the limitations of the service. Obtain knowledge of the relevant industry where
you can otherwise hire an expert to assist

• Confidentiality

- Refrain from disclosing confidential information (Unless there is a legal or professional right or
duty to disclose)
- Maintain confidentiality in social, business and family environments
- Maintain confidentiality of information disclosed by prospective client

Reviews from verified buyers

Showing all 2 reviews
2 year ago

3 year ago

4,5

2 reviews

5
1
4
1
3
0
2
0
1
0
Trustworthy reviews on Stuvia

All reviews are made by real Stuvia users after verified purchases.

Get to know the seller

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
StelliesBAcc Stellenbosch University
View profile
Follow You need to be logged in order to follow users or courses
Sold
15
Member since
3 year
Number of followers
13
Documents
3
Last sold
8 months ago

4,5

2 reviews

5
1
4
1
3
0
2
0
1
0

Recently viewed by you

Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their exams and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can immediately select a different document that better matches what you need.

Pay how you prefer, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card or EFT and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Frequently asked questions