100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached 4,6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Exam (elaborations)

HMPYC80 assignment 2 R.R.I (revised) FEEDBACK - research methodology

Rating
4,0
(1)
Sold
1
Pages
46
Grade
A+
Uploaded on
09-08-2022
Written in
2022/2023

FEEDBACK INCLUDED - ARTICLE ANALYSED: Chikobvu, P. & Harunavamwe, M. (2022) The influence of emotional intelligence and resilience on work engagement amongst nurses in public hospitals. SA,. Journal of Industrial Psychology, 48 (1919). CONTAINS: in depth analysis of the article according to the RRI REVISED MARKING CRITERIA.

Show more Read less











Whoops! We can’t load your doc right now. Try again or contact support.

Document information

Uploaded on
August 9, 2022
Number of pages
46
Written in
2022/2023
Type
Exam (elaborations)
Contains
Questions & answers

Content preview

HMPYC80
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY


Assignment 2
R.R.I (REVISED) ANALYSIS AND
FEEDBACK 2022




ARTICLE ANALYSED:
Chikobvu, P. & Harunavamwe, M.
(2022) The influence of emotional
intelligence and resilience on work
engagement amongst nurses in
public hospitals. SA,. Journal of
Industrial Psychology, 48 (1919).




BOOKLET CONTAINS:

1. Instructions from the tutorial letters AND ANSWERS/ FEEDBACK INCLUDED AT THE END OF THE DOC

2. In depth analysis of the 58 items for the R.R.I revised log. Includes break down of terms, quotes from
the article and answers for assignment 2 article.

3. Includes links to download the article and the review log needed to complete the assignment.

4. Example of the review log

,Tutorial Letter 102/0/2022

Assignment 02:
Review a research article with the Research Review Inventory (R.R.I. revised)

In this assignment, you must apply the Research Review Inventory (THIS INVENTORY HAS BEEN ATTACHED TO
THESE NOTES IN AN EASILY UNDERSTANDABLE MANNER) to review a published article in a peer-reviewed
journal.



OLD DUE DATE: Tuesday, 31 May 2022
NEW DUE DATE: According to the unisa system - Sunday, 5 June 2022, 11:59 PM.
Unique number: 867857
Year mark: Contribution to final mark: 10%
MCQ completed on the Moodle/MyUnisa platform




Steps to complete assignment 02:
1. Download relevant article (links below)
2. Download the Review Log for the R.R.I revised (link below)
3. Enter in your ratings and your reason for the rating into the Review Log
4. Submit your ratings when assignment 2 opens via the Moodle/ MyUnisa platform. It is MCQ.

Note that you must submit the answers for the 58 ratings online on the Moodle Quiz assessment Multiple-
Choice Question platform (without any comments/justifications/reasons).



Research article:
Chikobvu, P. & Harunavamwe, M. (2022) The influence of emotional intelligence and resilience on work
engagement amongst nurses in public hospitals. SA,. Journal of Industrial Psychology, 48 (1919).

ACTIVE LINK TO DONWLOAD ARTICLE:
https://sajip.co.za/index.php/sajip/article/view/1919/3399

ACTIVE LINK TO ACCESS ARTICLE ONLINE:
http://www.scielo.org.za/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2071-07632022000100001



R.R.I Revised Log
Use this link below to access MyUnisa and download a blank log for you to work from.
Document title: “Review Log for the Research Review Inventory MS WORD FILE Unisa HMPYC80”
https://mymodules.dtls.unisa.ac.za/mod/folder/view.php?id=111464


2

, HMPYC80/2022


HOW TO USE THE RESEARCH REVIEW INVENTORY (revised)
The review inventory consists of a number of items, numbered sequentially from 1 up to 58. You will find an
example of this review log with filled in answers on page 30 of this doc.



RATING SCALE :
Items should be reviewed and rated on a three-point rating scale from 1 to 3.

The ratings are defined as follows:

1: Absent, incorrect, or completely wrong.

2: Only partially addressed. It does not attain the item requirement or criteria.

3: Sufficiently up to standard in terms of the item criteria.

Every relevant item should be reviewed and rated on this three-point scale (1 to 3).




KEEP A RECORD OF YOUR ANSWERS
Use the R.R.I. (revised): Review Log to document and keep a record of your ratings.



REVIEWER COMMENTS AND THE FEEDBACK REPORT
Each rating is associated with general comments.
For example, suppose a reviewer reviews a particular proposal and gives a rating of “3” for the clarification of
the proposed study. The general comment would be: “The research question is formulated. A research question
is derived from the research issue.”



IMPORTANT NOTES
Remember, where the item criterion is not explicitly addressed then allocate a low rating (1). Good academic
writing is clear and transparent. If a reader needs to guess at whether an issue has been implemented and
addressed or not, then the writing is neither clear nor transparent. Only give a high rating (3) if the item criteria
have been explicitly addressed.


TIPS:
*To complete the log, read the Rating Item (R.R.I) column, refer back to the article, and then add in your
rate (1,2,3) to your blank log accordingly.

*When you complete the MCQ online, you will only have to add in your rating of 1, 2 or 3. No comments/
justifications will be necessary.

*Find an example of the review log you need to download on page 30.
3

, In Depth Analysis of the ASSIGNMENT 2 2022 Article using the
RESEARCH REVIEW INVENTORY
A. THE TITLE
Title of the article:
“The influence of emotional intelligence and resilience on work engagement amongst nurses in public
hospitals”
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
01. The title contains at least one central psychological construct from the research proposal or study.



What is a psychological construct?
Intelligence, motivation, anxiety, and fear are all examples of constructs. In psychology, a construct is a skill,
attribute, or ability that is based on one or more established theories.



Answer:
The influence of emotional intelligence and resilience on work engagement amongst nurses in public hospitals
Therefore it meets the criteria.
=3
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
02. The title indicates the research setting or demographic information of the sample population.

Any one of the following is sufficient: where, who, when, under what circumstances, or the phenomenon that is
being investigated.

Answer:
This title indicates:
where = public hospitals
who = nurses
phenomenon = emotional intelligence and resilience on work engagement
Therefore it meets the criteria.
=3
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
03. The title points to, or refers to, the research method, design or paradigm.
This may be signalled by a keyword or phrase such as: “lived experiences”, “perceptions”, “attitudes”,
“constructions”, “discourses”, “quasi-experimental”, “critical study”, “psychometric properties”, “correlational
study”, “inferential study”, and so on.



DISCLAIMER:
I HAVE ADDED IN ALL 58 ANSWERS. I GOT 88% WITH THESE
ANSWERS.
There is information and page numbers from the article added for
you to conclude the answer yourself. FEEDBACK PROVIDED AT THE
4 END.

Reviews from verified buyers

Showing all reviews
2 year ago

4,0

1 reviews

5
0
4
1
3
0
2
0
1
0
Trustworthy reviews on Stuvia

All reviews are made by real Stuvia users after verified purchases.

Get to know the seller

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
PerfectionistNotes University of South Africa (Unisa)
View profile
Follow You need to be logged in order to follow users or courses
Sold
4719
Member since
3 year
Number of followers
1049
Documents
175
Last sold
3 days ago
Perfectionist Notes - private psych hons assistance

Specialising in assistance for Counselling Psychology Honours students. I have worked hard to create reliable content for the students as well as personalized assistance.

4,4

683 reviews

5
425
4
145
3
68
2
25
1
20

Recently viewed by you

Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their exams and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can immediately select a different document that better matches what you need.

Pay how you prefer, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card or EFT and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Frequently asked questions