100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached 4.2 TrustPilot
logo-home
Exam (elaborations)

STUDY GUIDE Revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials (RoB 2) SHORT VERSION (CRIBSHEET)

Rating
-
Sold
-
Pages
24
Grade
A+
Uploaded on
09-05-2022
Written in
2022/2023

STUDY GUIDE Revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials (RoB 2) SHORT VERSION (CRIBSHEET)











Whoops! We can’t load your doc right now. Try again or contact support.

Document information

Uploaded on
May 9, 2022
Number of pages
24
Written in
2022/2023
Type
Exam (elaborations)
Contains
Questions & answers

Subjects

Content preview

Revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials (RoB 2)
SHORT VERSION (CRIBSHEET)
Edited by Julian PT Higgins, Jelena Savović, Matthew J Page, Jonathan AC Sterne
on behalf of the RoB 2 Development Group
Version of 22 August 2019




The development of the RoB 2 tool was supported by the MRC Network of Hubs for Trials Methodology Research (MR/L004933/2- N61), with the support of the
host MRC ConDuCT-II Hub (Collaboration and innovation for Difficult and Complex randomised controlled Trials In Invasive procedures - MR/K025643/1), by MRC
research grant MR/M025209/1, and by a grant from The Cochrane Collaboration.




This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.




1

,Preliminary considerations
Study design
 Individually-randomized parallel-group trial
 Cluster-randomized parallel-group trial
 Individually randomized cross-over (or other matched) trial

For the purposes of this assessment, the interventions being compared are defined as
Experimental: Comparator:


Specify which outcome is being assessed for risk of bias

Specify the numerical result being assessed. In case of multiple alternative
analyses being presented, specify the numeric result (e.g. RR = 1.52 (95% CI
0.83 to 2.77) and/or a reference (e.g. to a table, figure or paragraph) that
uniquely defines the result being assessed.

Is the review team’s aim for this result…?
 to assess the effect of assignment to intervention (the ‘intention-to-treat’ effect)
 to assess the effect of adhering to intervention (the ‘per-protocol’ effect)


If the aim is to assess the effect of adhering to intervention, select the deviations from intended intervention that should be addressed (at least one must be
checked):
 occurrence of non-protocol interventions
 failures in implementing the intervention that could have affected the outcome
 non-adherence to their assigned intervention by trial participants




2

, Which of the following sources were obtained to help inform the risk-of-bias assessment? (tick as many as apply)
 Journal article(s)
 Trial protocol
 Statistical analysis plan (SAP)
 Non-commercial trial registry record (e.g. ClinicalTrials.gov record)
 Company-owned trial registry record (e.g. GSK Clinical Study Register record)
 “Grey literature” (e.g. unpublished thesis)
 Conference abstract(s) about the trial
 Regulatory document (e.g. Clinical Study Report, Drug Approval Package)
 Research ethics application
 Grant database summary (e.g. NIH RePORTER or Research Councils UK Gateway to Research)
 Personal communication with trialist
 Personal communication with the sponsor




3

Get to know the seller

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
PREMIERGRADES Rutgers School Of Nursing
View profile
Follow You need to be logged in order to follow users or courses
Sold
100
Member since
5 year
Number of followers
94
Documents
400
Last sold
5 months ago
Academia

My documents are well thought out to help you achieve the highest grades . In the unlikely event your find any of documents wanting please inbox me so that i can assist you further. Success!

4,3

17 reviews

5
12
4
2
3
1
2
0
1
2

Recently viewed by you

Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their exams and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can immediately select a different document that better matches what you need.

Pay how you prefer, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card or EFT and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Frequently asked questions