100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached 4.2 TrustPilot
logo-home
Exam (elaborations)

PVL3704 Assignment 1 Semester 2 2022

Rating
3,5
(2)
Sold
13
Pages
4
Grade
A+
Uploaded on
27-03-2022
Written in
2022/2023

Solutions for PVL3704 assignment 1 for semester 2 of 2022










Whoops! We can’t load your doc right now. Try again or contact support.

Document information

Uploaded on
March 27, 2022
File latest updated on
August 14, 2022
Number of pages
4
Written in
2022/2023
Type
Exam (elaborations)
Contains
Questions & answers

Subjects

Content preview

PVL3704
ASSIGNMENT 1
SEMESTER 2 – 2022

, Question 1

A owns a factory manufacturing steel in a continuous process. His monthly electricity
bill averages R100 000. He just received a letter from the Johannesburg Municipality
in which it threatens to cut his electricity if he doesn’t immediately pay his “arrear
account of R300 000”. A knows that there must be a mistake, because his account is
paid in full, but also knows that if there is a disruption in his electricity supply he will
suffer severe losses. He pays the amount immediately and sends a letter of complaint.
Advise A whether he will be able to reclaim the R300 000 he paid, and with which
remedy? In your answer discuss the requirements for this remedy. (10)



Question 2

Discuss in general (without reference to a specific enrichment action) how the extent
of enrichment liability (or the quantum of the enrichment claim) will be calculated. (10)



SOLUTIONS
Question 1

(a) Identifying the correct action

The correct action to be instituted by A is the condictio indebiti. This action is available
in instances where a debt not owing was paid. Incidentally no unlawful, ultra vires or
void contract is relevant here and therefore it seems as if no other condictiones could
be applicable.



(b) Requirements for the action and defences against it
(i) Transfer of ownership in the form of payment of money or delivery of a specific
object
(ii) Payment has to take place under the mistaken belief that the performance was
due.
(iii) The mistake, either a legal or factual mistake, must have been reasonable in the
circumstances (iustus error).

Reviews from verified buyers

Showing all 2 reviews
3 year ago

3 year ago

All your quizzes answers were wrong

3,5

2 reviews

5
1
4
0
3
0
2
1
1
0
Trustworthy reviews on Stuvia

All reviews are made by real Stuvia users after verified purchases.

Get to know the seller

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
Studyexcel1 University of South Africa (Unisa)
View profile
Follow You need to be logged in order to follow users or courses
Sold
390
Member since
3 year
Number of followers
296
Documents
0
Last sold
1 year ago

3,7

54 reviews

5
23
4
12
3
7
2
5
1
7

Recently viewed by you

Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their exams and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can immediately select a different document that better matches what you need.

Pay how you prefer, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card or EFT and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Frequently asked questions