100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached 4,6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Case

Fosi v RAF (PVL1003W)

Rating
-
Sold
1
Pages
3
Grade
A+
Uploaded on
03-03-2022
Written in
2021/2022

This is a case that deals with the duty of support between the parent and child relationship.









Whoops! We can’t load your doc right now. Try again or contact support.

Document information

Uploaded on
March 3, 2022
Number of pages
3
Written in
2021/2022
Type
Case
Professor(s)
Jaco barnard-naudé
Grade
A+

Content preview

Fosi v RAF



Facts

A vehicle accident occurred and resulted in the death of a son. The mother sued the RAF
for damages because of the accident she has lost support and maintenance by her son
and was indigent, whom according to her, her son legitimately was bound to support and
maintain his parent and was actually doing so by the time of his death. RAF admitted
liability based on the negligence of the insured driver, but they disputed indigence

Legal issue

The issue is whether or not the plaintiff can be regarded as indigent such that the
deceased had a duty legally, to maintain and support her.

Ratio Decidendi

The deceased has a duty in law to support and maintain his/her indigent parents.

Law

Legislation

Law of Evidence Amendment Act 45 of 1988

All South African courts are empowered to apply customary law.

s211(3), The Constitution of The Republic of South Africa, 1996

“All Courts in South Africa must apply customary law where appropriate, subject the constitution and
legislation that deal in particular with customary law’’.

Case Law

Oosthuizen v Stanley 1938 AD 322 “A child's duty to support a parent arises if both parents are
indigent, unable to support themselves and if the child is able to provide support”.

Khan & another v Padayachy 1971 (3) SA 877 (W) “The liability of other siblings is not relevant to
a claim against one of them”.

Van Vuuren v Sam 1972 (2) SA 633 (AD) “To be indigent is to lack the basic needs such as food,
clothing, shelter and medication”.

Wigham v British Traders Insurance Co Ltd 1963 (3) SA 151 (W) at 153

1

Get to know the seller

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
IVY001 University of Cape Town
View profile
Follow You need to be logged in order to follow users or courses
Sold
10
Member since
4 year
Number of followers
9
Documents
14
Last sold
1 year ago

4,3

3 reviews

5
2
4
0
3
1
2
0
1
0

Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their exams and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can immediately select a different document that better matches what you need.

Pay how you prefer, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card or EFT and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Frequently asked questions