Written by students who passed Immediately available after payment Read online or as PDF Wrong document? Swap it for free 4,6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Exam (elaborations)

LPL Super semester Final exam

Rating
-
Sold
-
Pages
33
Grade
A
Uploaded on
01-10-2021
Written in
2021/2022

The best answers for the LPL4802 October/November final exam

Content preview

LPL4802 PORTFOLIO MEMO
SEPTEMBER 2021 SUPER
SEMESTER UNISA LAW OF
DAMAGES

written by

LLBExampacksAndTutorials

, www.stuvia.com




Downloaded by: shangkhan12 |
Distribution of this document is illegal

, Stuvia.com - The study-notes marketplace




LPL4802 PORTFOLIO
MEMO
SEPTEMBER 2021
LAW OF DAMAGES
UNISA



Downloaded by: shangkhan12 |
Distribution of this document is illegal

, Stuvia.com - The study-notes marketplace




FOOTNOTES &
BIBLIOGRAPHY INCLUDED
QUESTION 1 (ESSAY)
QUANTUM OF DAMAGES AND SATISFACTION FOR NON-PATRIMONIAL LOSS
(INJURY TO PERSONALITY)




Study the case of Economic Freedom Fighters and others v Manuel 2021 (3) SA 425 (SCA)
and answer the question below.




In para [92], the court exclaimed [sic], “An unliquidated claim for damages must be pursued
by institution of an action.” However, contrary to this accepted practice, the attorneys for the
respondent brought the claim of damages for defamation in an application proceeding.
Discuss fully, the reasons the court put forward in support of accepted practice, that general
damages for defamation must be instituted in an action proceeding. Refer to relevant case law
and legislation in your answer. (25)


[25 marks]
In this Case the SCA upheld a High Court ruling that a political party had defamed a former
politician by calling him “corrupt and Innepotistic” and describing a process over which he
was presiding “secretive”. The former politician had approached the High Court after the
political party posted a statement on Twitter, claiming that the statement was false and
damaging to his reputation. Although the High Court had held that the political party had
no defence to the publication of the statement, it commented that the defence of
reasonable publication – previously restricted for use by the media – was available to non-
media defendants as well. 1



1 Economic Freedom Fighters and others v Manuel 2021 (3) SA 425 (SCA) .




Downloaded by: shangkhan12 |
Distribution of this document is illegal

Document information

Uploaded on
October 1, 2021
Number of pages
33
Written in
2021/2022
Type
Exam (elaborations)
Contains
Questions & answers

Subjects

R651,00
Get access to the full document:

Wrong document? Swap it for free Within 14 days of purchase and before downloading, you can choose a different document. You can simply spend the amount again.
Written by students who passed
Immediately available after payment
Read online or as PDF

Get to know the seller
Seller avatar
shangkhan12
4,3
(3)

Get to know the seller

Seller avatar
shangkhan12 University of South Africa (Unisa)
View profile
Follow You need to be logged in order to follow users or courses
Sold
6
Member since
6 year
Number of followers
6
Documents
4
Last sold
4 year ago

4,3

3 reviews

5
1
4
2
3
0
2
0
1
0

Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their exams and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can immediately select a different document that better matches what you need.

Pay how you prefer, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card or EFT and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Working on your references?

Create accurate citations in APA, MLA and Harvard with our free citation generator.

Working on your references?

Frequently asked questions