SUMMARY Nothnagel v South African Legal Practice Council [2021] ZAGPPHC (8 January)

IRM1501 2021
IRM1501

Introduction to research for law and criminal justice

CASE SUMMARY

Nothnagel v South African Legal Practice Council [2021] ZAGPPHC (8 January

2021)

Facts of the Case

The applicant brought an application for admission and enrolment as a Legal
Practitioner of the Honourable Court. In terms of section 24 of the Legal Practice Act
28 of 2014, the applicant was admitted as a Legal Practitioner and is authorised to
be enrolled to practice as such by the Legal Practice Council. The South African
Legal Practice Council (LPC) has opposed this application and has appointed
Messrs Rooth and Wessels to act on their behalf.
The applicant, appearing for himself, in his application intent to be admitted and
practice as a Legal Practitioner / Attorney of the High Court of South Africa, and that
his name be enrolled on the Roll of Attorneys of the North Gauteng High Court. He
submits that he has complied with all the requirements……


Written by

Camecia Cass




BUY ME TO VIEW THE REST OF THE CASE
SUMMARY




Facts of the Case

The applicant brought an application for admission and enrolment as a Legal
Practitioner of the Honourable Court. In terms of section 24 of the Legal Practice Act
1