Started on Wednesday, 12 August 2026, 1:19 PM
State Finished
Completed on Wednesday, 12 August 2026, 1:25 PM
Time taken 6 mins 11 secs
Marks 25.00/25.00
Grade 100.00 out of 100.00
Question 1
Correct
Mark 10.00 out of 10.00
Flag question
Question text
Match the question with the correct answer.
Answer
1Choose...Indirect
applicationTextual
InterpretationNegat
ive
ObligationPurposiv
Rather than finding law or conduct unconstitutional and providing a e interpretationLess
constitutional remedy ( a declaration of invalidity), a court applies ordinary restrictive
law, but interprets or develops it with reference to the values in the Bill of meansProgressive
Rights. realisationRipeness
Vertical
ApplicationExclusi
ve JurisdictionAn
example of Direct
applicationPositive
obligationHorizont
al application
Answer
2Choose...Indirect
applicationTextual
InterpretationNegat
ive
ObligationPurposiv
Refers to the application of the Bill of Rights to a dispute between private e interpretationLess
parties where the constitutionality of legislation is not at issue. restrictive
meansProgressive
realisationRipeness
Vertical
ApplicationExclusi
ve JurisdictionAn
example of Direct
applicationPositive
, obligationHorizont
al application
Answer
3Choose...Indirect
applicationTextual
InterpretationNegat
ive
ObligationPurposiv
e interpretationLess
restrictive
Refers to the application of the Bill of Rights to a dispute which concerns
meansProgressive
the constitutionality of legislation; or a dispute to which the state is a party.
realisationRipeness
Vertical
ApplicationExclusi
ve JurisdictionAn
example of Direct
applicationPositive
obligationHorizont
al application
Answer
4Choose...Indirect
applicationTextual
InterpretationNegat
ive
ObligationPurposiv
e interpretationLess
In S v Makwanyane 1995 (3) SA 391 (CC), the Constitutional Court found restrictive
that the death penalty, provided for in section 277 of the Criminal Procedure meansProgressive
Act, was unconstitutional. It therefore declared section 277(1) invalid. realisationRipeness
Vertical
ApplicationExclusi
ve JurisdictionAn
example of Direct
applicationPositive
obligationHorizont
al application
Answer
5Choose...Indirect
applicationTextual
The court is prevented from deciding on an issue too early, when it could, InterpretationNegat
for example, be decided on by means of a criminal or civil case and should ive
not be made into a constitutional issue. ObligationPurposiv
e interpretationLess
restrictive
meansProgressive
realisationRipeness
State Finished
Completed on Wednesday, 12 August 2026, 1:25 PM
Time taken 6 mins 11 secs
Marks 25.00/25.00
Grade 100.00 out of 100.00
Question 1
Correct
Mark 10.00 out of 10.00
Flag question
Question text
Match the question with the correct answer.
Answer
1Choose...Indirect
applicationTextual
InterpretationNegat
ive
ObligationPurposiv
Rather than finding law or conduct unconstitutional and providing a e interpretationLess
constitutional remedy ( a declaration of invalidity), a court applies ordinary restrictive
law, but interprets or develops it with reference to the values in the Bill of meansProgressive
Rights. realisationRipeness
Vertical
ApplicationExclusi
ve JurisdictionAn
example of Direct
applicationPositive
obligationHorizont
al application
Answer
2Choose...Indirect
applicationTextual
InterpretationNegat
ive
ObligationPurposiv
Refers to the application of the Bill of Rights to a dispute between private e interpretationLess
parties where the constitutionality of legislation is not at issue. restrictive
meansProgressive
realisationRipeness
Vertical
ApplicationExclusi
ve JurisdictionAn
example of Direct
applicationPositive
, obligationHorizont
al application
Answer
3Choose...Indirect
applicationTextual
InterpretationNegat
ive
ObligationPurposiv
e interpretationLess
restrictive
Refers to the application of the Bill of Rights to a dispute which concerns
meansProgressive
the constitutionality of legislation; or a dispute to which the state is a party.
realisationRipeness
Vertical
ApplicationExclusi
ve JurisdictionAn
example of Direct
applicationPositive
obligationHorizont
al application
Answer
4Choose...Indirect
applicationTextual
InterpretationNegat
ive
ObligationPurposiv
e interpretationLess
In S v Makwanyane 1995 (3) SA 391 (CC), the Constitutional Court found restrictive
that the death penalty, provided for in section 277 of the Criminal Procedure meansProgressive
Act, was unconstitutional. It therefore declared section 277(1) invalid. realisationRipeness
Vertical
ApplicationExclusi
ve JurisdictionAn
example of Direct
applicationPositive
obligationHorizont
al application
Answer
5Choose...Indirect
applicationTextual
The court is prevented from deciding on an issue too early, when it could, InterpretationNegat
for example, be decided on by means of a criminal or civil case and should ive
not be made into a constitutional issue. ObligationPurposiv
e interpretationLess
restrictive
meansProgressive
realisationRipeness