Written by students who passed Immediately available after payment Read online or as PDF Wrong document? Swap it for free 4,6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Document preview thumbnail
Preview 1 out of 7 pages
Exam (elaborations)

LEV3701 Assignment 2 (COMPLETE ANSWERS) Semester 1 2026 - DUE 9 April 2026

Document preview thumbnail
Preview 1 out of 7 pages

LEV3701 Assignment 2 (COMPLETE ANSWERS) Semester 1 2026 - DUE 9 April 2026; 100% TRUSTED Complete, trusted solutions and explanations. For assistance, Whats-App 0.8.1..2.7.8..3.3.7.2... A final-year law student is charged with the alleged rape of a fellow student. During the trial, the victim testifies that the rape took place one night after a function, on a deserted part of the campus. She explains that she was involved in a serious wrestle with her assailant and identifies the accused as her attacker. During cross-examination, it is put to her that she is lying, because she couldn’t have observed the assailant’s identity properly. There was no moon on the night in question and there are no lights in that part of the campus. The accused also cross-examines her about her sexual relations with various other men and indicates that he intends calling witnesses in this regard. The prosecutor responds by calling the complainant’s flat mate, who testifies that the complainant gave her a similar version of the events that very same night. She also testifies to what the complainant said about the identity of her assailant. Question 1 Fully discuss, with reference to the Criminal Procedure Act 51 of 1977 and guidelines from case law, whether you would also have allowed the questions that were put to the complainant during cross-examination. Also explain whether you will allow him to call witnesses in this regard. (12) Question 2 Because of the nature of the crime, the flat mate was allowed to testify as an exception. However, before this exception can apply, certain requirements must be satisfied. Name this exception and mention the requirements that must be met before the exception will apply. Do not discuss or explain the requirements. (4) Question 3 If the prosecutor never called the complainant to testify, this changes the nature of the evidence that the flat mate can give. Give a definition of this type of evidence and mention the exceptions for admissibility. Do not discuss or explain the exceptions. (4)

Content preview

LEV3701
Assignment 2 Semester 1 2026
Unique number:
Due Date: 9 April 2026
QUESTION 1

Section 227(2) of the Criminal Procedure Act 51 of 1977 clearly prohibits evidence relating
to the complainant’s sexual history, unless the court grants leave on the basis that such
evidence is relevant to the issues before the court.1 In this matter, the questions relate to the
complainant’s sexual activities with other men and have no direct connection to the alleged
rape by the accused. They are therefore irrelevant and inadmissible.

The court in S v M 2003 (1) SA 341 (SCA) set out key factors to guide a section 227(2)
enquiry.1 These include:

i. the interests of justice, including the accused’s right to present a full defence




Terms of use
By making use of this document you agree to:
 Use this document as a guide for learning, comparison and reference purpose,
Terms of use
 Not to duplicate, reproduce and/or misrepresent the contents of this document as your own work,
By making use of this document you agree to:
 Use this document
Fully accept the consequences
solely as a guide forshould you plagiarise
learning, reference,or and
misuse this document.
comparison purposes,
 Ensure originality of your own work, and fully accept the consequences should you plagiarise or misuse this document.
 Comply with all relevant standards, guidelines, regulations, and legislation governing academic and written work.

Disclaimer
Great care has been taken in the preparation of this document; however, the contents are provided "as is" without any express or
implied representations or warranties. The author accepts no responsibility or liability for any actions taken based on the
information contained within this document. This document is intended solely for comparison, research, and reference purposes.
Reproduction, resale, or transmission of any part of this document, in any form or by any means, is strictly prohibited.

Connected book
 image
Pamela-Jane Schwikkard, S. E. Van der Merwe Principles of Evidence
Publisher: 2009 ISBN: 9780702179501 Edition: Unknown

Document information

Uploaded on
April 2, 2026
Number of pages
7
Written in
2025/2026
Type
Exam (elaborations)
Contains
Questions & answers
R75,00

Wrong document? Swap it for free Within 14 days of purchase and before downloading, you can choose a different document. You can simply spend the amount again.
Written by students who passed
Immediately available after payment
Read online or as PDF

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
EduPal
4,2
(14306)
Sold
153687
Followers
36023
Items
5086
Last sold
1 hour ago

Reviews from verified buyers



Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their exams and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can immediately select a different document that better matches what you need.

Pay how you prefer, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card or EFT and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Working on your references?

Create accurate citations in APA, MLA and Harvard with our free citation generator.

Working on your references?

Frequently asked questions