100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached 4,6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Summary

Summary statistics Field (English) Ch. 3, 6, 8-9, 11-13, 15

Rating
-
Sold
-
Pages
28
Uploaded on
14-04-2021
Written in
2019/2020

This summary covers all aspects that were discussed (and you will be tested on) during the 4.4C AMDA course.

Institution
Course










Whoops! We can’t load your doc right now. Try again or contact support.

Connected book

Written for

Institution
Study
Course

Document information

Summarized whole book?
No
Which chapters are summarized?
Hoofdstuk 3, 6, 8, 9, 11, 12, 13, 15
Uploaded on
April 14, 2021
Number of pages
28
Written in
2019/2020
Type
Summary

Subjects

Content preview

Field summary (5th ed.)
Chapter 3: NHST and effect sizes p. 3
NHST
researcher degrees of freedom
statistical significance
effect sizes: Cohen’s d and Pearson’s r
odds ratio

Chapter 6: Statistical bias p. 4
bias
outlier
violation of assumption: linearity and additivity, normality, homogeneity/homoscedasticity,
independence
trimming
winsorizing
bootstrapping

Chapter 8: Correlations p. 6
covariation
bivariate correlation
one-tailed and two-tailed probability
directional and non-directional hypothesis
point-biserial correlation and biserial correlation
discrete dichotomy and continuous dichotomy
semi-partial (part) correlation and partial correlation

Chapter 9: Linear regression model p. 8
single regression
predicted value
multiple regression
parameter
total error
residual sum of squares, SSR
goodness of fit
sum of squared differences, SST
proportion of improvement, R2
F-statistic
mean squares, MS
unstandardized residuals, standardized residuals, and studentized residuals
adjusted predicted value
Cook’s distance
leverage
Mahalanobis distance
multicollinearity, VIF, and tolerance
cross-validation
hierarchical regression
forced entry

,stepwise, forward and backward
F-change
eigenvalues

Chapter 11: Moderation, mediation, and multi-category predictors p. 12
moderation
grand mean centring
simple slopes analysis
zone of significance
mediation
simple relationship and mediated relationship

Chapter 12: Comparing several independent means p. 15
F-statistic
SST, SSM, dfM, SSR, MS, MSM, MSR
Welch’s F and Brown-Forsythe’s F
contrast coding
post hoc tests
weights for planned contrasts
grand mean
non-orthogonal contrasts
standard contrasts: deviation (first and last), simple (first and last), repeated, Helmert, difference
(reverse Helmert)
between-group effects table
within-group effects table
harmonic mean sample size

Chapter 13: ANCOVA p. 20
covariates
adjusted means
partial eta-squared
omega squared

Chapter 14: Factorial designs p. 22
independent factorial design (Ch. 14)
repeated-measures (related) factorial design (Ch. 15)
mixed design (Ch. 16)
slope interaction term

Chapter 15: Repeated-measures designs p. 25
random intercept model
sphericity and Mauchly’s test
Greenhouse-Geisser and Huynh-Feldt
lower-bound estimate of sphericity
SSw, dfSSW
MSM, MSR, and F
factorial repeated-measures design

Chapter 16: Mixed designs p. 28
mixed designs

, Chapter 3: NHST and effect sizes
Null hypothesis significance testing (NHST)
Tests H0 against Ha to see whether Ha is likely to be true. p is used as an index of the evidence weight
against H0.
 Problem with NHST: reliance on merely refuting H0 (all-or-nothing thinking, with p<.05 or >.05)
 Researcher degrees of freedom: showing results in the most favorable light possible (not
controlling the Type I error rate)
- p-hacking: selectively reporting significant p-values
- p-HARKing: hypothesizing after the results are known

Statistical significance
p = the probability of getting a test statistic at least as large as the one observed, relative to all
possible values of the test statistic from an infinite number of identical replications.
 p doesn’t measure the size/importance of an effect, so don’t use p as the measure of probability
that the hypothesis in question is true/false
 small p suggests data are compatible with Ha, large p suggests data are compatible with H0

Effect sizes
Effect sizes = objective and (usually) standardized measures of the magnitude of observed effects.
 Standardized: allows to compare [effect sizes] across different studies that have measured different
variables/used different scales of measurement.
The size of the effect should be placed within the research context. However, rules of thumb are:
Cohen’s d Pearson’s r
small .2 .1 r=.1 explains 1% of total variance
medium .5 .3 r=.3 explains 9% of total variance
large .8 .8 (r=.5 explains 25% of total variance)

Cohen’s d: Calculated by dividing the difference between means by the standard deviation:
d = (mean1 – mean2)/s
 expressed in s-units, therefore standardized, and more reliable than Pearson’s r when group sizes
are discrepant

Pearson’s correlation coefficient r: A measure of the strength of the relationship between 2 variables
(either continuous or one continuous and one categorical with two categories).
 r is not linear, meaning r=60 is not 2x r=30. It is constrained to lie between 0 (no effect) and 1.

Odds ratio: Popular effect size for counts as an outcome (e.g. on 2 categorical variables) with outcome
being a number of participants choosing each option on the categorical variables).
 count is summarized in a [2x2] contingency table
 odds = pevent/pno event = pevent/total / pno event/total
 odds = 1 indicates that the odds of one outcome are the same as odds for the other outcome

Effect sizes as an indication to NHST:
- interpreting effects on a continuum rather than a rule (of p < .05)
- affected by sample size, but without a decision rule attached (e.g. p < .05)
- due to absence of decision rule: less researcher degrees of freedom.

Effect sizes can be used in a meta-analysis as it gives the average effect size across studies: ∑effect
sizes/Neffect sizes

Get to know the seller

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
NienkeRaaijmakers Hogeschool Rotterdam
Follow You need to be logged in order to follow users or courses
Sold
46
Member since
8 year
Number of followers
28
Documents
10
Last sold
2 weeks ago

4,6

5 reviews

5
3
4
2
3
0
2
0
1
0

Recently viewed by you

Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their exams and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can immediately select a different document that better matches what you need.

Pay how you prefer, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card or EFT and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Frequently asked questions