LCP4807 Assignment 2 Semester 1 2026 Due 21 April 2026

UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH AFRICA

College of Law




LCP4807
International Human Rights Law


Semester I, 2026 — Assignment 02

Legal Opinion: Exhaustion of Domestic Remedies,
Admissibility Before the African Commission,
and the African Human Rights System




Due Date: Tuesday, 21 April 2026 (Cut-off: 16:00)

Module: LCP4807 — International Human Rights Law

Assignment: 02

Prepared by: Expert in International Human Rights Law


This legal opinion is prepared for academic purposes

in compliance with UNISA assessment requirements.




Department of Criminal and Procedural Law | UNISA | 2026

,UNISA | LCP4807 Exhaustion of Domestic Remedies & African Human Rights



Contents


Table of Contents 2


1 Question 1: Legal Opinion on the Principle of Exhaustion of Domestic Reme-
dies 3

1.1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3

1.2 1.1 The Principle of Exhaustion of Domestic Remedies: General Overview . . . . 3

1.3 1.2 The Nature of the Remedy: Available, Effective, and Adequate . . . . . . . . 4

1.4 1.3 Question (a): Can DAA Take This Case to the ACERWC? . . . . . . . . . . 5

1.4.1 The Correct Forum: ACERWC, Not the African Commission . . . . . . . 5

1.4.2 The Problem of Non-Exhaustion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5

1.5 1.4 Question (b): Is the Exhaustion Prerequisite Flexible or Inflexible? . . . . . . 6

1.6 1.5 Question (c): Circumstances Under Which the Applicant May Be Exempted . 7

1.6.1 1.5.1 Futility of Domestic Remedies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7

1.6.2 1.5.2 Unavailability of Remedies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7

1.6.3 1.5.3 Undue Prolongation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8

1.6.4 1.5.4 Gross or Systematic Violations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8

1.6.5 1.5.5 State Waiver . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8

1.7 1.6 Conclusion to Question 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9


2 Question 2: Legal Opinion — COMOROS and the Case of the Daniel/Ricardor
Family Before the African Commission 10

2.1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10

2.2 2.1 Can the NGO Take This Case to the African Commission? . . . . . . . . . . . 10

2.2.1 2.1.1 Standing (Locus Standi) of the NGO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10

2.2.2 2.1.2 State Party Status of Sofala . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11


Page 1 of 18

, UNISA | LCP4807 Exhaustion of Domestic Remedies & African Human Rights


2.2.3 2.1.3 The Article 34(6) Declaration Issue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11

2.3 2.2 Procedural Issues: Admissibility Under Article 56 of the African Charter . . . 11

2.3.1 2.2.1 Exhaustion of Domestic Remedies in This Case . . . . . . . . . . . . 12

2.4 2.3 Substantive Issues: Rights Violated Under the African Charter . . . . . . . . 12

2.4.1 2.3.1 Right to Education (Article 17) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12

2.4.2 2.3.2 Right to the Best Attainable Standard of Health and to a Healthy En-
vironment (Articles 16 and 24) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13

2.4.3 2.3.3 Right to Development (Article 22) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13

2.4.4 2.3.4 Rights of Women Under the Maputo Protocol . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13

2.4.5 2.3.5 Economic, Social and Cultural Rights Under the ICESCR . . . . . . 14

2.5 2.4 The Budgetary Constraints Defence: A Critical Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . 14

2.5.1 2.4.1 The Domestic Court’s Position . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14

2.5.2 2.4.2 Implications for the African Commission . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15

2.6 2.5 Possible Remedies Before the African Commission . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15

2.7 2.6 Conclusion to Question 2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16


Reference List 17




Page 2 of 18