Phil 347 Study guides, Class notes & Summaries

PHIL 347 Critical Thinking Week 3 Checkpoint Quiz Q&A Score for this quiz: 48 out of 50 Submitted May 24 at 6:04pm This attempt took 149 minutes. According to the text, how do the views of stronger, more developed critical thinkers toward authority differ from those in earlier stages of cognitive development? Your Answer: Developed critical thinkers are skeptical. They will not trust the word of an authority figure without skepticism and their own research. Critical Thinkers are likely r...

PHIL 347 WEEK 5 JOURNAL ASSIGNMENT / UPDATED VERSION 2023/2024 GRADED A+ CHAMBERLAIN UNIVERSITY. 1 Week 5 : Journal Chamberlain School of Nursing 347L: Critical Reasoning lOMoARcPSD| 2 Week 5 : Journal Self-Regulation Self-regulation to my own understanding means taking the time to regulate the way you think and decide. It is a practiced behavior where one makes it a habit of using their critical thinking skills to guide their judgements and though before reaching a decision . Sy...

PHIL 347 FINAL EXAM Questions and Verified Answers | Latest 2023/2024 Omnipotence --- God can do anything that is intrinsically (non-contradictory) possible for God to do Omniscience --- God knows the future - God is immutable, so foreknowledge is nonexistent > *obj*: God would "change his mind" depending on what an agent chooses to do The Kalam Cosmological Argument --(1) everything that begins to exist has a *cause* (2) the universe began to exist > the number of past events is...

PHIL 347 Week 3 Checkpoint Quiz (100% Correct). According to the text, how do the views of stronger, more developed critical thinkers toward authority differ from those in earlier stages of cognitive development? (pg. 116 - 117) Our text explains that folks in the earlier stages of cognitive development view authority as someone who is powerful and capable of controlling others' behavior, or as someone trustworthy, who can offer good advice (Facione & Gittens, 2016). For example, parents a...

Question 1 5 / 5 pts Based on what you have read in the text, the lecture, and any other sources you find helpful to your understanding of deductive arguments, explain the structure of a deductive argument in your own words. Your Answer: A deductive argument typically has two premises and a conclusion based on those premises. In order for the conclusion to be true, the premises must be true as well. Therefore, if the premises are true, the conclusion will certainly be true. Deductive re...

Question: According to the text, how do the views of stronger, more developed critical thinkers toward authority differ from those in earlier stages of cognitive development? Question: Briefly, in yo ur own words, state how the text defines “expert.” Question: When presented with a claim unsupported by reasons (for example, “the health risks of vaping have been underestimated”), what three options does a critical thinker have to evaluate such a claim? Question: Is the following statement...

Week 7 Course Project: Argumentative Paper PHIL 347: Critical Reasoning This study source was downloaded by fro m CourseH on 10-11-2022 06:09:18 GMT -05:00 Topic: Free College for Everyone Equality is one of the virtues that is so beneficial to the society and should be given a key consideration in every aspect of the society. The topic selected in week one for this project was meant to discuss the issue of equality as it relates to a college education. The topic on "Free College for Everyone...

Instructions What are the three fundamental reasoning strategies listed in the text? Answer: 1. Comparative reasoning 2. Ideological reasoning 3. Empirical reasoning What is comparative r easoning? On what skill is it based? Answer: Comparative reasoning is used to illustrate, illuminate, suggest, or hypothesize the process of using what is familiar to make interpretations, explanations, or inferences about what is less familiar. Based on critical thinking skills. We learned four tests for evalu...

Question: What are the three fundamental reasoning strategies listed in the text? Question: What is comparative reasoning? On what skill is it based? Question: We learned four tests for evaluating arguments: truthfulness of the premises, logical strength, relevance, and non-circularity. How well do these tests work with respect to evaluating comparative reasoning? Consider each of the four tests. Question: Briefly explain how we can determine if one comparison is more comprehensive than another....