Enrichment Liability and Estoppel PVL3704
University of South Africa (Unisa)
Here are the best resources to pass Enrichment Liability and Estoppel PVL3704. Find Enrichment Liability and Estoppel PVL3704 study guides, notes, assignments, and much more.
All 5 results
Sort by:
-
Exam (elaborations)
PVL3704 Assignment 1 2025 - Due 13 March 2025
-
5.0(1)5.037February 20252024/2025A+
- Question 1 
 
 
Discuss (by reference to relevant case law) the requirement that the enrichment 
must have been sine causa. 
 
 
Requirement that the Enrichment Must Have Been Sine Causa 
 
In the context of unjustified enrichment, the requirement that the enrichment must 
have been sine causa (without legal cause) is fundamental. This principle ensures 
that a party who receives a benefit without a justifiable reason can be compelled to 
return it. Various case law illustrates how South Afr...
-
$3.19 More Info
Falconntutors
-
Exam (elaborations)
PVL3704 Assignment 1 (QUALITY ANSWERS) Semester 1 2024
-
---14January 20242023/2024A+
- This document contains workings, explanations and solutions to the PVL3704 Assignment 1 (QUALITY ANSWERS) Semester 1 2024. For assistance call or us on 0.6.8..8.1.2..0.9.3.4..... QUESTION 1 
Discuss the general requirement that the defendant’s enrichment must have been at the expense of the plaintiff. Refer in your answer to case law. (15) 
QUESTION 2 
A has sold uncut diamonds to B for an amount of R10 000,000 in contravention of statutory law. B has paid the amount, but before the diamonds c...
-
$3.19 More Info
StudyShack
-
Exam (elaborations)
PVL3704 Assignment 1 (DETAILED ANSWERS) Semester 1 2024 - DISTINCTION GUARANTEED
-
--112January 20242023/2024A+
- PVL3704 Assignment 1 (ANSWERS) Semester 1 2024 - DISTINCTION GUARANTEED. Answers, guidelines, workings and references..... ........ QUESTION 1 
Discuss the general requirement that the defendant’s enrichment must have been at the expense of the plaintiff. Refer in your answer to case law. (15) 
QUESTION 2 
A has sold uncut diamonds to B for an amount of R10 000,000 in contravention of statutory law. B has paid the amount, but before the diamonds could be delivered, the money was confiscated by...
-
$3.19 More Info
VarsityC
-
Exam (elaborations)
PVL3704 Assignment 1 (ANSWERS) Semester 1 2024 - DISTINCTION GUARANTEED
-
---10January 20242023/2024A+
- Well-structured PVL3704 Assignment 1 (ANSWERS) Semester 1 2024 - DISTINCTION GUARANTEED. (DETAILED ANSWERS - DISTINCTION GUARANTEED!)....... QUESTION 1 
Discuss the general requirement that the defendant’s enrichment must have been at the expense of the plaintiff. Refer in your answer to case law. (15) 
QUESTION 2 
A has sold uncut diamonds to B for an amount of R10 000,000 in contravention of statutory law. B has paid the amount, but before the diamonds could be delivered, the money was confi...
-
$3.19 More Info
Edge