Ls185 Study guides, Class notes & Summaries

LS185 6 A LS185 Unit 4 Assignment Global University LS185 According to The Smithsonian National Museum of American HIstory, The Brown v. The Board of Education case of 1954 marked a turning point in the history of race relations in the United States (Separate, 2016). During this time in history, segregation laws restricted African American students to attend school with white students. As a consequence, a student by the name of Linda Brown who lived in Topeka, Kansas became fed up with t...

LS185 Introduction to American Jurisprudence Unit 6 Assignment 1. Summary of a U.S. Supreme Court Case: Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973) In the case of Roe v. Wade (1973), the court concluded that the right to privacy included the abortion decision and that states could not ban the procedure in the first trimester. In this lawsuit, Roe alleged that the state laws were unconstitutionally vague and diminished her right of personal privacy, protected by the First, Fourth, Fifth,...

LS185 Introduction to American Jurisprudence Unit 4 Assignment Part One: The US Constitution was responsible for the establishment of America’s national government and fundamental laws- it was enacted to guarantee basic rights for citizens. In this document, it was established that in order to obtain a stronger federal government they would initiate the separation of powers. Cornell Law School defines the term “separation of powers” as a model that divides the government...

LS185 Unit 8 Assignment The Latin term respondeat superior translates to “let the master answer,” refers to a legal doctrine in which an employer may be held responsible for the actions of his employees when the actions are performed throughout the course of employment. In order for respondeat superior to apply, there must be a clear employee-employer relationship established, as the principle does not apply to actions by an independent contractor (Legal Dictionary). 1. ...

Purdue Global University LS185 MEMORANDUM TO: Senior Partner - Dewey, Earn, and Howe FROM: Willy Understand, Paralegal - Dewey, Earn, and Howe DATE: 07/12/2020 RE: Federal law to be imposed to cause motorcyclists to wear helmets to prevent injury and/or death As the Senior Partner at Dewey, Earn, and Howe has previously and concisely stated, “there seems to be no question that motorcycle helmets are an important safety precaution that prevent death and ...

LS185 1. Would this case apply to Mr. Time’s case? Why or why not? In the case of Goldberg v Kelly, it was established that state and federal government agencies could only remove welfare benefits after a pre-termination hearing. During a pre-termination hearing, welfare recipients have the opportunity to confront witnesses before an impartial adjudicator. In Mr. Time’s case, he was not offered any type of notice and/or hearing in order to question witnesses or address the allegations ...