Assignment 2 Semester 2 2025
Unique #:
Due Date: September 2025
Detailed solutions, explanations, workings
and references.
+27 81 278 3372
, The Constitutional disparages in arranged marriages for disabled persons
By
[RRLLB81 STUDENT]
(012345678)
Submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree
BACHELOR OF LAWS
in the
DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL AND PROCEDURAL LAW
SCHOOL OF LAW
UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH AFRICA
SUPERVISOR: PROF MM MONYAKANE
RRLLB81 ASSESSMENT 2 / FINAL PORTFOLIO
(DUE DATE: September 2025)
Varsity Cube 2025 +27 81 278 3372
, ABSTRACT
This research examines the constitutional and legal challenges surrounding
arranged marriages for persons with disabilities in South Africa. Central to the inquiry
is whether a mentally disabled person can give valid consent to marriage, given that
marriage is both a contract and a personal decision. The research explores
constitutional values of dignity, equality, and freedom of choice, alongside statutory
provisions in the Marriage Act 25 of 1961, the Recognition of Customary Marriages
Act 120 of 1998, and the Mental Health Care Act 17 of 2002. Case law, such as
Prinsloo’s Curators Bonis v Crafford and Prinsloo (1905) TS 669 and Martinson v
Brown 1961 (4) SA 109 (C), highlights how courts address legal capacity and
consent. International instruments, including the Convention on the Rights of
Persons with Disabilities, provide further guidance. The findings emphasise that
constitutional principles demand protection of the autonomy and dignity of persons
with disabilities, limiting the validity of arranged marriages without free and informed
consent.
KEYWORDS
Arranged marriages
Consent
Disability rights
Legal capacity
South African constitutional law
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS
Varsity Cube 2025 +27 81 278 3372