, FUR2601 Assignment 2 (COMPLETE ANSWERS)
Semester 1 2025 - DUE April 2025; 100% 100% trusted,
comprehensive and complete reliable solution with clear
explanation
QUESTION 1 There is a crisis in the provision of social grants
due to an invalid tender. The matter goes to court, and the court
gives its order. Examine the following four items in the court
order. Name each remedy used, and briefly explain why the
Court chose to use each of them. (In other words, briefly explain
the necessity/benefit of each remedy)
1.1 The Contract for the payment of social grants between the
South African Social Security Agency (SASSA) and Cash
Paymaster Services (Pty) Ltd (Cash Paymaster) dated 3
February 2012 is declared invalid. (3)
Background:
The South African Social Security Agency (SASSA) is
responsible for distributing social grants to eligible citizens in
South Africa. In 2012, SASSA entered into a contract with Cash
Paymaster Services (Pty) Ltd (Cash Paymaster), which was
tasked with disbursing social grants to recipients.
However, the contract between SASSA and Cash Paymaster
Services came under scrutiny. The case was taken to court, and
in 2014, the Constitutional Court of South Africa declared the
contract invalid.
The Reason for Invalidity:
Semester 1 2025 - DUE April 2025; 100% 100% trusted,
comprehensive and complete reliable solution with clear
explanation
QUESTION 1 There is a crisis in the provision of social grants
due to an invalid tender. The matter goes to court, and the court
gives its order. Examine the following four items in the court
order. Name each remedy used, and briefly explain why the
Court chose to use each of them. (In other words, briefly explain
the necessity/benefit of each remedy)
1.1 The Contract for the payment of social grants between the
South African Social Security Agency (SASSA) and Cash
Paymaster Services (Pty) Ltd (Cash Paymaster) dated 3
February 2012 is declared invalid. (3)
Background:
The South African Social Security Agency (SASSA) is
responsible for distributing social grants to eligible citizens in
South Africa. In 2012, SASSA entered into a contract with Cash
Paymaster Services (Pty) Ltd (Cash Paymaster), which was
tasked with disbursing social grants to recipients.
However, the contract between SASSA and Cash Paymaster
Services came under scrutiny. The case was taken to court, and
in 2014, the Constitutional Court of South Africa declared the
contract invalid.
The Reason for Invalidity:
