, FUR2601 Assignment 2 (COMPLETE ANSWERS)
Semester 1 2025 - DUE April 2025; 100% 100% trusted,
comprehensive and complete reliable solution with clear
explanation
QUESTION 1 There is a crisis in the provision of social grants
due to an invalid tender. The matter goes to court, and the court
gives its order. Examine the following four items in the court
order. Name each remedy used, and briefly explain why the
Court chose to use each of them. (In other words, briefly explain
the necessity/benefit of each remedy)
1.1 The Contract for the payment of social grants between the
South African Social Security Agency (SASSA) and Cash
Paymaster Services (Pty) Ltd (Cash Paymaster) dated 3
February 2012 is declared invalid. (3)
In this case, the court order states that the contract between the
South African Social Security Agency (SASSA) and Cash
Paymaster Services (Pty) Ltd, dated 3 February 2012, is
declared invalid. The remedy used here is "a declaration of
invalidity". Here's the explanation for why the court chose to
use this remedy:
Remedy: Declaration of Invalidity
• Purpose: The court declares the contract invalid to correct
a legal wrong and restore the status quo. This remedy
effectively nullifies the contract, acknowledging that the
agreement was not legally sound from the beginning.
• Benefit/Justification: The necessity of this remedy arises
from the fact that the tender process or the contract might
Semester 1 2025 - DUE April 2025; 100% 100% trusted,
comprehensive and complete reliable solution with clear
explanation
QUESTION 1 There is a crisis in the provision of social grants
due to an invalid tender. The matter goes to court, and the court
gives its order. Examine the following four items in the court
order. Name each remedy used, and briefly explain why the
Court chose to use each of them. (In other words, briefly explain
the necessity/benefit of each remedy)
1.1 The Contract for the payment of social grants between the
South African Social Security Agency (SASSA) and Cash
Paymaster Services (Pty) Ltd (Cash Paymaster) dated 3
February 2012 is declared invalid. (3)
In this case, the court order states that the contract between the
South African Social Security Agency (SASSA) and Cash
Paymaster Services (Pty) Ltd, dated 3 February 2012, is
declared invalid. The remedy used here is "a declaration of
invalidity". Here's the explanation for why the court chose to
use this remedy:
Remedy: Declaration of Invalidity
• Purpose: The court declares the contract invalid to correct
a legal wrong and restore the status quo. This remedy
effectively nullifies the contract, acknowledging that the
agreement was not legally sound from the beginning.
• Benefit/Justification: The necessity of this remedy arises
from the fact that the tender process or the contract might
