100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached 4.2 TrustPilot
logo-home
Exam (elaborations)

AQA_2024: A-level History - Component 2S The Making of Modern Britain, 1951–2007 (Merged Question Paper and Marking Scheme)

Rating
-
Sold
-
Pages
20
Grade
A+
Uploaded on
14-03-2025
Written in
2024/2025

AQA_2024: A-level History - Component 2S The Making of Modern Britain, 1951–2007 (Merged Question Paper and Marking Scheme) A-level HISTORY Component 2S The Making of Modern Britain, 1951–2007 Friday 7 June 2024 Materials For this paper you must have:  an AQA 16-page answer book. Instructions Afternoon  Use black ink or black ball-point pen. Time allowed: 2 hours 30 minutes  Write the information required on the front of your answer book. The Paper Reference is 7042/2S.  Answer three questions. In Section A answer Question 01. In Section B answer two questions. Information  The marks for questions are shown in brackets.  The maximum mark for this paper is 80.  You will be marked on your ability to: – use good English – organise information clearly – use specialist vocabulary where appropriate. Advice  You are advised to spend about: – 1 hour on Question 01 from Section A – 45 minutes on each of the two questions answered from Section B. IB/M/Jun24/7042/2S 3 key areas: 1. Post-War Recovery and the 1950s:  Winston Churchill’s Return (1951–1955): Post-war recovery, austerity measures, and the Suez Crisis (1956).  Eisenhower and the "Special Relationship" with the USA.  Economic difficulties, including rationing, and the role of Labour governments in nationalization. 2. The 1960s – Social and Cultural Change:  Harold Wilson's Labour Government (1964–1970): The “white heat of technology”, focusing on modernization and reform.  Key social reforms: the abolition of the death penalty, legalization of abortion, and the permissive society.  Cultural revolution: the rise of the counterculture, the Beatles, and the Sexual Revolution. 3. Economic Challenges and the 1970s:  Edward Heath's Conservative government (1970–1974): Struggled with inflation, union power, and the miners' strike.  The 1973 oil crisis and the rise of stagflation.  Callaghan's Labour government (1976–1979): The Winter of Discontent (1978–1979), leading to widespread strikes and loss of public confidence. 4. Thatcherism (1979–1990):  Margaret Thatcher’s Conservative government: Major economic reforms, including privatization, reducing the power of trade unions, and embracing free-market policies.  The Falklands War (1982), which boosted Thatcher’s popularity.  Social and economic polarization: “Victorian” values and the rise of the yuppie culture.  The Poll Tax and the growth of class tensions. 5. Economic and Political Shifts in the 1990s:  John Major’s government (1990–1997): Economic instability due to Black Wednesday (1992) and the UK’s exit from the ERM.  The end of the Cold War, EU integration, and the focus on social reforms.  The rise of New Labour under Tony Blair. 6. New Labour and the 2000s:  Tony Blair's leadership (1997–2007): Major reforms in education, health, and devolution for Scotland, Wales, and Northern Ireland.  The Good Friday Agreement (1998) and peace in Northern Ireland.  Foreign policy: The UK’s involvement in the Iraq War (2003), which led to significant controversy and political fallout.  Economic prosperity early in Blair’s tenure, followed by challenges in dealing with inequality and housing. These key areas summarize the main political, social, and economic developments in Britain between 1951 and 2007. Turn over ► IB/M/Jun24/7042/2S 4 IB/M/Jun24/7042/2S IB/M/Jun24/G4006/E3 7042/2S Section A Answer Question 01. Source A From a major televised debate on the state of the Labour Party by the moderate MP, Stephen Haseler, March 1980. Haseler was expelled from Labour and joined the SDP, 1981. I joined the Labour party, the party of Attlee and Gaitskell, over 21 years ago, seeing it as a vehicle for achieving social progress for working people. Now that party is changing fundamentally. It is being taken over, unrecognisable with its past. We on the right of the party have warned of this development for years. The moderates in the party are increasingly intimidated by the extremist infiltrators. What to do about it? What is the position of people who stand in the moderate tradition of social democracy? Some, understandably, will fight on within the party but I believe that once the Left has completed its takeover of the party our nation is finished. We’re doomed forever to a struggle to the death between a Marxist-based party on the one hand and a party of the privileged on the other. I believe the country is yearning for some escape from the two extremes, for the birth of a new radical centre social democratic force to bring hope and national unity. 5 10 Source B From ‘The Downing Street Years’, an autobiography by Margaret Thatcher, 1993. Thatcher is commenting on the state of the political opposition at the time of the 1983 UK general election. The opposition itself was divided between Labour and the new SDP, which claimed to have truly broken the mould of British two-party politics. But we were the mould breakers. I always felt that the leaders of the SDP would have done better to stay in the Labour Party and drive out the Far Left. SDP support had peaked by 1983. As for Labour, it had continued its unstoppable leftward shift. Michael Foot is a highly principled and cultivated man, and was invariably courteous in our dealings. In debate and on the platform he has a kind of genius. But the policies he adopted were not only catastrophically unsuitable for Britain, they also provided an umbrella beneath which sinister revolutionaries, intent on destroying the institutions of the state and the values of society, were able to shelter. The more the public learned of Labour’s policies and personnel the less they liked them. There was no doubt that in the extreme form adopted under Michael Foot’s leadership Labour was easier to beat. 5 10 3 Source C From reminiscences given in an interview for a book on Militant Tendency by Mike Hogan in Liverpool, 2012. Hogan was a left-wing Labour activist in the early 1980s. Growing up on a working-class estate in Liverpool, I was already aware of the class struggle. So many workers were being thrown out of work at that time, it felt like everything was collapsing around you. I started going to Young Socialist meetings and got recruited into Militant Tendency. Militant was proper Labour. It was all about believing the working class can run things. It seemed to me for the first time in my short life that there was hope. That’s where I was coming from. I was at the huge demo outside Liverpool Town Hall in March 1984 against Thatcher’s rate-capping. About 50 000 people packed the city centre. I spoke from the top of the Town Hall steps about youth unemployment and how the council was prepared to fight and do something about government cuts. To be honest with you, we had a kind of arrogance, a sure belief we knew what needed to be done. But we were betrayed by the leadership of the Labour movement. 5 10 0 1 With reference to these sources and your understanding of the historical context, assess the value of these three sources to an historian studying the problems of the Labour Party in the 1980s. [30 marks] Turn over for Section B IB/M/Jun24/7042/2S Turn over ► 6 IB/M/Jun24/7042/2S Section B Answer two questions. 0 2 To what extent were the lives of British people transformed by Conservative governments in the years 1951 to 1957? [25 marks] 0 3 ‘Britain’s international position grew stronger in the years 1970 to 1974.’ Assess the validity of this view.

Show more Read less
Institution
AQA_2024: A-level History - Component 2S
Course
AQA_2024: A-level History - Component 2S










Whoops! We can’t load your doc right now. Try again or contact support.

Written for

Institution
AQA_2024: A-level History - Component 2S
Course
AQA_2024: A-level History - Component 2S

Document information

Uploaded on
March 14, 2025
Number of pages
20
Written in
2024/2025
Type
Exam (elaborations)
Contains
Questions & answers

Subjects

Content preview

2




AQA_2024: A-level History - Component 2S
The Making of Modern Britain, 1951–2007
(Merged Question Paper and Marking Scheme)




A-level
HISTORY
Component 2S The Making of Modern Britain, 1951–2007


Friday 7 June 2024 Afternoon Time allowed: 2 hours 30 minutes
Materials
For this paper you must have:
 an AQA 16-page answer book.

Instructions
 Use black ink or black ball-point pen.
 Write the information required on the front of your answer book. The Paper Reference is
7042/2S.
 Answer three questions.
In Section A answer Question 01.
In Section B answer two questions.

Information
 The marks for questions are shown in brackets.
 The maximum mark for this paper is 80.
 You will be marked on your ability to:
– use good English
– organise information clearly
– use specialist vocabulary where appropriate.

Advice
 You are advised to spend about:
– 1 hour on Question 01 from Section A
– 45 minutes on each of the two questions answered from Section B.




IB/M/Jun24/7042/2S

, 3

key areas:

1. Post-War Recovery and the 1950s:

 Winston Churchill’s Return (1951–1955): Post-war recovery, austerity measures, and the
Suez Crisis (1956).
 Eisenhower and the "Special Relationship" with the USA.
 Economic difficulties, including rationing, and the role of Labour governments in
nationalization.

2. The 1960s – Social and Cultural Change:

 Harold Wilson's Labour Government (1964–1970): The “white heat of technology”,
focusing on modernization and reform.
 Key social reforms: the abolition of the death penalty, legalization of abortion, and the
permissive society.
 Cultural revolution: the rise of the counterculture, the Beatles, and the Sexual
Revolution.

3. Economic Challenges and the 1970s:

 Edward Heath's Conservative government (1970–1974): Struggled with inflation, union
power, and the miners' strike.
 The 1973 oil crisis and the rise of stagflation.
 Callaghan's Labour government (1976–1979): The Winter of Discontent (1978–1979),
leading to widespread strikes and loss of public confidence.

4. Thatcherism (1979–1990):

 Margaret Thatcher’s Conservative government: Major economic reforms, including
privatization, reducing the power of trade unions, and embracing free-market policies.
 The Falklands War (1982), which boosted Thatcher’s popularity.
 Social and economic polarization: “Victorian” values and the rise of the yuppie culture.
 The Poll Tax and the growth of class tensions.

5. Economic and Political Shifts in the 1990s:

 John Major’s government (1990–1997): Economic instability due to Black Wednesday
(1992) and the UK’s exit from the ERM.
 The end of the Cold War, EU integration, and the focus on social reforms.
 The rise of New Labour under Tony Blair.

6. New Labour and the 2000s:

 Tony Blair's leadership (1997–2007): Major reforms in education, health, and devolution
for Scotland, Wales, and Northern Ireland.
 The Good Friday Agreement (1998) and peace in Northern Ireland.
 Foreign policy: The UK’s involvement in the Iraq War (2003), which led to significant
controversy and political fallout.
 Economic prosperity early in Blair’s tenure, followed by challenges in dealing with inequality
and housing.

These key areas summarize the main political, social, and economic developments in Britain between
1951 and 2007.


IB/M/Jun24/7042/2S Turn over ►

, 4




IB/M/Jun24/G4006/E3 7042/2S
Section A

Answer Question 01.




Source A

From a major televised debate on the state of the Labour Party by the moderate MP,
Stephen Haseler, March 1980. Haseler was expelled from Labour and joined the SDP,
1981.

I joined the Labour party, the party of Attlee and Gaitskell, over 21 years ago, seeing it as
a vehicle for achieving social progress for working people. Now that party is changing
fundamentally. It is being taken over, unrecognisable with its past. We on the right of the
party have warned of this development for years. The moderates in the party are
increasingly intimidated by the extremist infiltrators. What to do about it? What is the 5
position of people who stand in the moderate tradition of social democracy? Some,
understandably, will fight on within the party but I believe that once the Left has
completed its takeover of the party our nation is finished. We’re doomed forever to a
struggle to the death between a Marxist-based party on the one hand and a party of the
privileged on the other. I believe the country is yearning for some escape from the two 10
extremes, for the birth of a new radical centre social democratic force to bring hope and
national unity.




Source B

From ‘The Downing Street Years’, an autobiography by Margaret Thatcher, 1993.
Thatcher is commenting on the state of the political opposition at the time of the 1983 UK
general election.

The opposition itself was divided between Labour and the new SDP, which claimed to
have truly broken the mould of British two-party politics. But we were the mould
breakers. I always felt that the leaders of the SDP would have done better to stay in the
Labour Party and drive out the Far Left. SDP support had peaked by 1983. As for
Labour, it had continued its unstoppable leftward shift. Michael Foot is a highly principled 5
and cultivated man, and was invariably courteous in our dealings. In debate and on the
platform he has a kind of genius. But the policies he adopted were not only
catastrophically unsuitable for Britain, they also provided an umbrella beneath which
sinister revolutionaries, intent on destroying the institutions of the state and the values of
society, were able to shelter. The more the public learned of Labour’s policies and 10
personnel the less they liked them. There was no doubt that in the extreme form adopted
under Michael Foot’s leadership Labour was easier to beat.




IB/M/Jun24/7042/2S

Get to know the seller

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
Kimmey Walden university
View profile
Follow You need to be logged in order to follow users or courses
Sold
129
Member since
2 year
Number of followers
76
Documents
1112
Last sold
5 months ago

4.9

408 reviews

5
392
4
9
3
4
2
0
1
3

Recently viewed by you

Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their tests and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can instantly pick a different document that better fits what you're looking for.

Pay as you like, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Frequently asked questions