SOLUTION MANUAL
The Legal Environment of Business, 14th Edition
by Roger E. Meiners, Verified Chapters 1 - 22, Complete
The Legal Environment of Business, 14th Edition
jt jt jt jt jt jt
Downloaded by: Bookista |
jt jt jt jt Want to earn $1.236
jt jt jt
Distribution of this document is illegal
jt jt jt jt jt extra per year?
jt jt
, =
TABLEOF CONTENTS
jt jt
Chapter 1. Today’s Business Environment: Law and Ethics
Chapter 2. The Court Systems
Chapter 3. Trials and Resolving Disputes
Chapter 4. The Constitution: Focus on Application to Business
Chapter 5. Criminal Law and Business
Chapter 6. Elements of Torts
Chapter 7. Business Torts and Product Liability
Chapter 8. Real and Personal Property
Chapter 9. Intellectual Property
Chapter 10. Contracts
Chapter 11. Domestic and International Sales
Chapter 12. Business Organizations
Chapter 13. Negotiable Instruments, Credit, and Bankruptcy
Chapter 14. Agency and the Employment Relationship
Chapter 15. Employment and Labor Regulations
Chapter 16. Employment Discrimination
Chapter 17. The Regulatory Process
Chapter 18. Securities Regulation
Chapter 19. Consumer Protection
The Legal Environment of Business, 14th Edition
jt jt jt jt jt jt
Downloaded by: Bookista |
jt jt jt jt Want to earn $1.236
jt jt jt
Distribution of this document is illegal
jt jt jt jt jt extra per year?
jt jt
, =
Chapter 20. Antitrust Law
Chapter 21. Environmental Law
Chapter 22. The International Legal Environment of Business
CHAPTER 1 j t
Table of Contents j t j t
Answer to Discussion Question........................................................................................................................ 1
Answers to Case Questions ............................................................................................................................... 1
Answers to Ethics and Social Questions ................................................................................................. 3
Answer to Discussion Question j t j t j t
Should the common law maxim “Ignorance of the law is no excuse” apply to an
jt jt j t
immigrant who speaks little English and was not educated in the United States?
jt jt
How about for a tourist who does not speak English? Everyone knows
jt j t j t j t
j criminal acts are prohibited, but what about subtler rules that differ
t jt j t j t j t j t j t j t j t j t j t
j across countries and so may be misunderstood by foreigners?
t j t j t j t j t j t j t j t j t
Answer: It is generally true that ignorance of the law is no excuse. Citizens are
deemed to have constructive knowledge of the law. Yet, as well known as
jt jt
this jt rule is, it is surprising how often it is proffered as j t j t j t j t j t j t j t j t j t j t j t
an j t excuse. (A Westlaw
j t j t search cases finds hundreds j t of examples).
j t jt j t j t j t j t j t j t j t j t j t j t j t j t j t
Examples
j t include: Deluco v. Dezi (Conn.j t Super) j t (lack of knowledge j t j t j t j t jt j t j t j t j t j t j t j t j t j t j t j t
regarding
j t the state‘s usury laws is no excuse
j t j t for the inclusion
j t j t j t j t j t j t j t j t j t j t j t j t j t j t j t j t j t
of
j t an j t illegal interestj t rate
j t in a salesj t contract);
j t and Plumlee j t j t j t j t j t j t j t j t j t j t j t j t j t j t jt
v.
j t Paddock
j t (ignorance
j t of
j t the fact that the subject matterj t of j t j t j t j t j t jt j t j t j t j t j t j t j t j t j t j t j t
the contract
j t was j t illegal was not excuse). The
j t courts
j t have j t j t j t j t j t j t j t j t j t j t j t j t j t j t
provided
j t j t a small exception to the rule when
j t it
j t comes toj t j t jt j t j t j t j t j t j t j t j t j t j t j t j t j t j t
people
j t in
j t lack of English language skills.
j t j tConsider Flanery
j t v. j t j t j t j t j t j t j t jt j t j t j t j t j t j t j t
Kuska,
j t (defendant did not speak
j t English
j t was advised by a friend j t j t j t j t j t j t j t j t j t j t j t j t jt j t j t j t j t
that
j t anj t answer to a complaint
j t j t was not required);
j t j t j t j t j t j t j t j t j t j t j t j t j t j t j t
Ramon
j t v. j t j t
Dept. of Transportation, (no English and an inability to understand the law
required for an excuse); Yurechko v. County of Allegheny, (Ignorance and with
jt
jt the fact that the municipality suffered no hardship in late lawsuit j t filing
j was an
t excuse). j t j t
Answers to Case Questions j t j t j t
The Legal Environment of Business, 14th Edition
jt jt jt jt jt jt
Downloaded by: Bookista | jt jt jt jt Want to earn $1.236 jt jt jt
Distribution of this document is illegal jt jt jt jt jt extra per year? jt jt
, =
1. Facts from an English judge’s decision in 1884: “The crew of an English yacht
jt
were cast away in
jt
a storm on the high seas . . . and were compelled to put into an open
boat...................................................................................................................................................They had no
jt jt jt
supply
of water and no supply of food. . . . That on the eighteenth day . . . they
.........................................................................................................................................................suggested that one
should be sacrificed to save the rest. . . . That next day . . . they . . .
went to the boy ................................................................................................................................... put a knife
jt jt j t j t
into his throat and killed him . . . the three men fed upon the body of
the boy for four days; [then]
jt
the boat was picked up by a passing vessel, and [they] were rescued. . . .
and committed for trial. . . .
jt
if jthe t men had
j t not fed j upont the j body
t of j thet boy they j t j t j t j t j t j t j t j t j t
j wouldt probably not j t have survived to
jt be sovbpicked
j t up and j t j t j t j t j t j t
j rescued,
t but would j have
t died of j t famine. The j t boy,
j t being in j t jt j t j t j t j t j t j t j t
j a much weaker
t j t j t
condition, was likely to have died before themThe real question in this case [is] jt
whether killing
jt jt
under the conditions set forth be or be not murder.” Do you consider the j t
acts to be immoral?
jt
[Regina v. Dudley and Stephens, 14 Queens Bench Division 273 (1884)]
Answer: This j tpoints
j t out that the legal
j t system
j t has limits. Its j t j t j t j t j t j t j t j t j t j t j t j t j t j t j t j t j t
acceptability
j t is dictated by legal culture--which determines
j t whether
j t law
j t j t jt j t j t j t j t jt j t j t j t j t j t
will
j t be enforced,
j t obeyed,
j t avoided, or j t abused.j t It is limited by the j t j t j t j t jt j t j t j t j t j t j t j t j t j t j t j t
j t informalj t rules of the society--its customs
j t and values.
j t One limit
j t j t j t j t j t j t j t j t j t j t jt j t j t j t j t j t
is
j t the extent
j t toj t which society will
j t allow j t the formal j t j t j t j t j t j t j t j t j t j t j t j t j t j t j t
rules
j t
to be imposed when a crime is committed in odd circumstances. Here there jt jt
was an intentional murder. Does the motive for the murder, the effort to
jt
save several lives by sacrificing one
jt
The Legal Environment of Business, 14th Edition
jt jt jt jt jt jt
Downloaded by: Bookista |
jt jt jt jt Want to earn $1.236 jt jt jt
Distribution of this document is illegal jt jt jt jt jt extra per year? jt jt