Tutors you can trust. Voted “BEST
SELLING” memos for the year 2022/2023.
IRM1501
INTRODUCTION TO RESEARCH METHODOLOGY FOR
LAW AND CRIMINAL JUSTICE
ASSIGNMENT 2 MEMO
SEMESTER 1 – 2024 - UNISA
UNIQUE NUMBER: -
DUE DATE: - APRIL 2024
Includes Footnotes and/or Bibliography.
ASSIGNMENT PREVIEW
Find the case of Makate v Vodacom (Pty) Ltd (CCT52/15) [2016] ZACC 13; 2016 (6) BCLR
709 (CC); 2016 (4) SA 121 (CC) (26 April 2016) and discuss this case in the prescribed
format (Facts, legal question, reasons for the decision or ratio decidendi and the findings).
(20 MARKS)
Disclaimer
Extreme care has been used by our Tutors to draft this document, however the contents are provided “as is” without any representations
or warranties, express or implied. This document is to be used for comparison, research and reference purposes ONLY. No part of this
document may be reproduced, resold or transmitted in any form or by any means without prior written permission from the Author. –
LLB EXAMPACKS & TUTORIALS.
PAST PAPERS & MEMOS, ASSIGNMENT MEMOS, NOTES, SUMMARIES & TUITONS.
Cell: 062 810 8624 Email:
Fax: 086 096 5452 www.llbexampacksandtutorials.co.za
, ASSIGNMENT TWO
QUESTION
Find the case of Makate v Vodacom (Pty) Ltd (CCT52/15) [2016] ZACC 13; 2016 (6)
BCLR 709 (CC); 2016 (4) SA 121 (CC) (26 April 2016) and discuss this case in the
prescribed format (Facts, legal question, reasons for the decision or ratio
decidendi and the findings).
(20 MARKS)
Case:
Makate v Vodacom (Pty) Ltd (CCT52/15) [2016] ZACC 13; 2016 (6) BCLR 709 (CC);
2016 (4) SA 121 (CC) (26 April 2016)
Facts:
- Nkosana Makate claimed that he had approached Vodacom with the idea for the
"Please Call Me" service, which allows users to send a free text asking someone
to call them back. 1
- Makate argued that Vodacom had agreed to compensate him for the idea but failed
to do so adequately. 2
- Vodacom acknowledged the inception of the idea but contended that the
compensation offered was fair and rejected Makate's claim for a substantial
amount. 3
1
Makate v Vodacom (Pty) Ltd (CCT52/15) [2016] ZACC 13; 2016 (6) BCLR 709 (CC); 2016 (4) SA 121 (CC) (26 April
2016)
2
Makate v Vodacom (Pty) Ltd (CCT52/15) [2016] ZACC 13; 2016 (6) BCLR 709 (CC); 2016 (4) SA 121 (CC) (26 April
2016)
3
Makate v Vodacom (Pty) Ltd (CCT52/15) [2016] ZACC 13; 2016 (6) BCLR 709 (CC); 2016 (4) SA 121 (CC) (26 April
2016)
SELLING” memos for the year 2022/2023.
IRM1501
INTRODUCTION TO RESEARCH METHODOLOGY FOR
LAW AND CRIMINAL JUSTICE
ASSIGNMENT 2 MEMO
SEMESTER 1 – 2024 - UNISA
UNIQUE NUMBER: -
DUE DATE: - APRIL 2024
Includes Footnotes and/or Bibliography.
ASSIGNMENT PREVIEW
Find the case of Makate v Vodacom (Pty) Ltd (CCT52/15) [2016] ZACC 13; 2016 (6) BCLR
709 (CC); 2016 (4) SA 121 (CC) (26 April 2016) and discuss this case in the prescribed
format (Facts, legal question, reasons for the decision or ratio decidendi and the findings).
(20 MARKS)
Disclaimer
Extreme care has been used by our Tutors to draft this document, however the contents are provided “as is” without any representations
or warranties, express or implied. This document is to be used for comparison, research and reference purposes ONLY. No part of this
document may be reproduced, resold or transmitted in any form or by any means without prior written permission from the Author. –
LLB EXAMPACKS & TUTORIALS.
PAST PAPERS & MEMOS, ASSIGNMENT MEMOS, NOTES, SUMMARIES & TUITONS.
Cell: 062 810 8624 Email:
Fax: 086 096 5452 www.llbexampacksandtutorials.co.za
, ASSIGNMENT TWO
QUESTION
Find the case of Makate v Vodacom (Pty) Ltd (CCT52/15) [2016] ZACC 13; 2016 (6)
BCLR 709 (CC); 2016 (4) SA 121 (CC) (26 April 2016) and discuss this case in the
prescribed format (Facts, legal question, reasons for the decision or ratio
decidendi and the findings).
(20 MARKS)
Case:
Makate v Vodacom (Pty) Ltd (CCT52/15) [2016] ZACC 13; 2016 (6) BCLR 709 (CC);
2016 (4) SA 121 (CC) (26 April 2016)
Facts:
- Nkosana Makate claimed that he had approached Vodacom with the idea for the
"Please Call Me" service, which allows users to send a free text asking someone
to call them back. 1
- Makate argued that Vodacom had agreed to compensate him for the idea but failed
to do so adequately. 2
- Vodacom acknowledged the inception of the idea but contended that the
compensation offered was fair and rejected Makate's claim for a substantial
amount. 3
1
Makate v Vodacom (Pty) Ltd (CCT52/15) [2016] ZACC 13; 2016 (6) BCLR 709 (CC); 2016 (4) SA 121 (CC) (26 April
2016)
2
Makate v Vodacom (Pty) Ltd (CCT52/15) [2016] ZACC 13; 2016 (6) BCLR 709 (CC); 2016 (4) SA 121 (CC) (26 April
2016)
3
Makate v Vodacom (Pty) Ltd (CCT52/15) [2016] ZACC 13; 2016 (6) BCLR 709 (CC); 2016 (4) SA 121 (CC) (26 April
2016)
