You will have to evaluate submissions of your two peers, fill out the Rubric, AND write your feedback in the Comments box. 1. Open the assigned submission (one at the time). 2. Read and evaluate the work. 3. Evaluate based on the rubic below fill out e

Human Nutrition Assessing reliable source-1 1. Has achieved the aim of the assignment. Provides substantial information on all the three nutritional sites. Provides an accurate URL for each site. Has made a proper comparison between the three sites rating each on a scale of 1-10. Is well informed about health and nutrition. The organization is satisfactory. 25 pts 2. Provides relevant and valuable information on the two nutritional experts. Is well aware of who the two experts are. So brief. Is uncertain of the capabilities of the second expert. 6 pts 3. The grammar is appropriate although there are some punctuation errors. No spelling errors. Has a good choice of words. 3 pts Total Points:34 out of 44 The writer has researched on the subject well and presented the findings well. This work is admirable and of quality. However, some punctuation errors and the weak organization of the finding has lowered the writer’s points. The titles should be distinguished by underlining from the findings to make it easier for the one reading the article.