100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached 4.2 TrustPilot
logo-home
Exam (elaborations)

PHILOSOPHY 102 TEST 1| LATEST SOLUTION

Rating
-
Sold
-
Pages
10
Grade
A+
Uploaded on
10-01-2024
Written in
2023/2024

PHILOSOPHY 102 TEST 1| LATEST SOLUTION Q U ESTIO N 1 1. There are seventeen chairs in the classroom. Every chair has a student in it. There are seventeen students in the classroom. The above argument is . valid invali d Q U ESTIO N 2 1. What is the reason given for not allowing statistics to decide your moral rules according to the essay, "How Not to Answer Moral Questions?" just because a lot of people think something is moral doesn't make it moral thinking it doesn't make it morally correct just because you have a preference for something doesn't make it moral Q U ESTIO N 3 1. All mammals are mortal. All dogs are mammals. Therefore, all dogs are mortal. The above argument is . valid invali d Q U ESTIO N 4 1. According to the essay, "The Nature of Ethical Disagreement" ethical disagreements can be resolved through reason. never sometim es always Q U ESTIO N 5 1. In the essay, "How Not to Answer Moral Questions" the author uses the term preferences. Preferences means the same thing as the word "attitude" from the essay, "The Nature of Ethical Disagreement." tru e fals e Q U ESTIO N 6 1. The two quotes below represent a disagreement in . "Lying is never just." "Lying is sometimes just." attitud e belief Q U ESTIO N 7 1. "So" is an indicator word for a(n) . premise conclusi on Q U ESTIO N 8 1. Logic is concerned with . the relationship between the premises and conclusions the truth of the premises the truth of the conclusion the falsity of the premises Q U ESTIO N 9 1. According to he essay, "Supreme Moral Principle" the flaw to the positive golden rule is . A) It does not forbid the masochist from hitting people. B) It suggests that the masochist should hit people. C) You could kill someone for other people's pleasure and it would be considered moral if enough people enjoyed it. D) Just because you consider your own self-interest in your decision does not mean that you don't considers others as well. A B C D Q U ESTIO N 10 1. A masochist decides it's morally ok to slap her friend because being slapped is not hateful to her. This is an example of which theory? golden rule negative golden rule utilitarianism egoism Q U ESTIO N 11 1. Which of the following is an invalid argument. an argument containing true premises and a true conclusion an argument with true premises and a false conclusion an argument with false premises and a false conclusion Q U ESTIO N 12 1. There are five phones in the office. There is a person on every phone. There are at least five people in the office. The above argument is . valid invali d Q U ESTIO N 13 1. "Because" is an indicator word for a(n) . premise conclusi on Q U ESTIO N 14 1. According to he essay, "Supreme Moral Principle" the flaw to utilitarianism is . A) It does not forbid the masochist from hitting people. B) It suggests that the masochist should hit people. C) You could kill someone for other people's pleasure and it would be considered moral if enough people enjoyed it. D) Just because you consider your own self-interest in your decision does not mean that you don't considers others as well. A B C D Q U ESTIO N 15 1. If Sara walks to work then she will be late. Sara walked to work. Sara was late. The above argument is . valid invali d Q U ESTIO N 16 1. A cashier gave Samantha back an additional $10 and Samantha decided to keep the money because keeping the money is in her best interests. This is an example of which theory? golden rule negative golden rule utilitarianism egoism

Show more Read less









Whoops! We can’t load your doc right now. Try again or contact support.

Document information

Uploaded on
January 10, 2024
Number of pages
10
Written in
2023/2024
Type
Exam (elaborations)
Contains
Questions & answers

Subjects

Get to know the seller

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
QUICKEXAMINER Walden University
View profile
Follow You need to be logged in order to follow users or courses
Sold
87
Member since
2 year
Number of followers
44
Documents
5450
Last sold
3 weeks ago
QUICK EXAMINER

Looking for high-quality study materials to help you excel? You’re in the right place! I provide well-structured notes, summaries, essays, and research papers across various subjects, all designed to make studying easier and more efficient. Why Choose My Materials? ✔ Comprehensive and well-organized content ✔ Easy-to-understand explanations ✔ Time-saving summaries for exams and research ✔ Carefully curated to ensure accuracy and clarity Each document is crafted to provide valuable insights, helping you grasp concepts quickly and effectively. Whether you're preparing for exams, writing an assignment, or just need clear and concise notes, my resources will support your academic journey. Browse my collection and take your studies to the next level

Read more Read less
3.6

15 reviews

5
5
4
5
3
2
2
0
1
3

Recently viewed by you

Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their tests and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can instantly pick a different document that better fits what you're looking for.

Pay as you like, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Frequently asked questions