WGU D002 Drill Questions and Answers

WGU D002 Drill Questions and Answers Brown v. Topeka Board of Education (1954) The Supreme Court ruled that "separate is not equal" and that education must be made available to all children on equal terms. Honig v. Doe Court ruled that students with disabilities could not be excluded indefinitely if misbehavior is "disability related." Endrew F. v Douglas County School District 2017 (8-0 decision) ruled in favor of a higher standard of education for children with disabilities. - Chief Justice Roberts' majority opinion stated that a child's "educational program must be appropriately ambitious in light of his circumstances" and that "every child should have the chance to meet challenging objectives." Daniel R. R. v State Board of Education One of the important cases that opened the door to increased inclusion of children with disabilities in regular education classes. Irving Independent School v Tatro Local Education Agency (LEA) is required to provide required related services regardless of the expense if such services can be provided by a non-physician (catheter) Board of Henrick Hudson Central School District v Rowley June 28, 1982 Determined that appropriate is not necessarily an optimal educational experience. Larry P. v Riles Case Ruled that IQ test could not be used as the primary or sole basis of placing students in special programs Mills v Board of Education of the District of Columbia The court ruled that the lack of funds is not an excuse for failing to provide services to students with disabilities. PARC vs. commonwealth of PA accessibility for education Diana v California State Board of Education 1970 Students cannot be placed in special education based on culturally biased IQ tests. Group-administered IQ tests cannot be used for SPED eligibility determination Hobson v Hanson Court ruled against tracking based on IQ tests.