PHIL 347 Week 4 Assignment: Journal | Already GRADED A Week 4 Assignment Chamberlain University PHIL347N: Critical Reasoning Inference: Briefly discuss how the lexical definitions and connotations of "valid" and "warranted" can help us un ders

PHIL 347 Week 4 Assignment: Journal | Already GRADED A Week 4 Assignment Chamberlain University PHIL347N: Critical Reasoning Inference: Briefly discuss how the lexical definitions and connotations of "valid" and "warranted" can help us un derstand the differing purposes of deductive and inductive arguments. • Valid is something well-grounded on principles or evidence; able to withstand criticism or objection, as an argument; sound. For example, a passport is valid until it is expired. Warranted is thought to be the ingredient that separates mere true belief from actual knowledge. It is a matter of controversy. The lexical definitions and connotations of valid and warranted helps us understand the differing purposes of deductive and inductive reasoning by how new information impacts the reasoning. With Warranted arguments new information can lead us to reconsider our conclusions without abandoning any of our original premises. With new information in hand, we may reasonably determine that our original conclusion was a mistake, even though all of our premises remain true. With valid arguments, the conclusion is implied or entailed by the premises which means that if the conclusion is false, then one or more of the premises may be false also (Facione & Gittens p. 175, 2016). Valid goes to deductive reasoning as warranted goes to inductive reasoning. Fallacies: Denying the Antecedent • If everyone who lived in Mississippi drank red wine daily, then the wine industry would be booming. But some Mississippians never drink red wine, so the wine industry is not booming. (Facione & Gittens p. 167, 2016). • Valid argument: Denying the consequent Premises 1: If A, then B. Premises 2: Not A. Conclusion: therefore; not B Explain, in your own words, how the fallacy is revealed through analysis of the valid argument template. o The fallacy is revealed through the use of grammar. According to the text, “Analysis of the meanings of the terms used and the grammatical rules of the language reveal the source