WGU D265 CRITICAL
THINKING REASON AND
EVIDENCE EXAMINATION TEST
2026 EXAM SCRIPT FULL
SOLUTIONS 100% CORRECT
◉ Weak Argument. Answer: is one that lacks sufficient
evidence, logical reasoning, or persuasive power to support its
claim. It fails to provide compelling or convincing reasons for
its position, making it less effective in influencing others or
standing up to scrutiny.
◉ Antecedent. Answer: is what happens or is stated before
something else.
◉ Inference. Answer: is a logical deduction or conclusion
drawn based on available evidence, reasoning, or observations.
It involves making an educated guess or reaching a probable
outcome based on the information at hand, often extending
beyond what is explicitly stated.
◉ Strong Argument. Answer: is one that presents compelling
evidence, logical reasoning, and persuasive elements to support
its claim. It effectively addresses counterarguments, provides
relevant examples, and utilizes sound logic, making it more
likely to convince or persuade others.
◉ Deductive Reasoning. Answer: is a logical process where a
conclusion is derived from premises that are known or assumed
to be true. It follows a specific pattern, such as the syllogistic
form, where the conclusion is necessarily true if the premises
are true, and the logical structure is valid. (Syllogistic form is a
deductive reasoning pattern that consists of two premises and a
conclusion, following the "all A is B, and all B is C, therefore
all A is C" structure)
, ◉ True Reasoning. Answer: refers to the process of drawing
logical conclusions that align with objective reality or factual
accuracy. It involves logical coherence, consistency, and
adherence to evidence and facts, leading to valid and reliable
conclusions.
◉ Valid Reasoning. Answer: refers to the logical structure of an
argument where the conclusion necessarily follows fallacy from
the premises. It ensures that if the premises are true, the
conclusion must also be true, irrespective of the actual
truthfulness of the premises.
◉ Strong Reasoning. Answer: refers to the use of sound logic,
compelling evidence, and persuasive elements to support a
claim or argument. It demonstrates coherence, relevance, and
logical consistency, making it more likely to convince or
persuade others.
◉ Unsound. Answer: refers to an argument that is flawed or
invalid, lacking logical reasoning or proper evidence to support
its conclusion.
◉ Sound. Answer: refers to an argument that is strong and valid,
with logical reasoning and evidence that supports its conclusion,
making it reliable and persuasive.
◉ Cogent. Answer: refers to an argument that is convincing and
well-supported, presenting strong reasoning and evidence that
makes it highly persuasive and likely to be true.
◉ Uncogent. Answer: refers to an argument that is weak or
unconvincing, lacking strong reasoning or sufficient evidence to
support its conclusion, making it less reliable or persuasive.
◉ Anchoring or Adjustment Bias. Answer: refers to the
tendency to rely heavily on an initial reference point (anchor)
THINKING REASON AND
EVIDENCE EXAMINATION TEST
2026 EXAM SCRIPT FULL
SOLUTIONS 100% CORRECT
◉ Weak Argument. Answer: is one that lacks sufficient
evidence, logical reasoning, or persuasive power to support its
claim. It fails to provide compelling or convincing reasons for
its position, making it less effective in influencing others or
standing up to scrutiny.
◉ Antecedent. Answer: is what happens or is stated before
something else.
◉ Inference. Answer: is a logical deduction or conclusion
drawn based on available evidence, reasoning, or observations.
It involves making an educated guess or reaching a probable
outcome based on the information at hand, often extending
beyond what is explicitly stated.
◉ Strong Argument. Answer: is one that presents compelling
evidence, logical reasoning, and persuasive elements to support
its claim. It effectively addresses counterarguments, provides
relevant examples, and utilizes sound logic, making it more
likely to convince or persuade others.
◉ Deductive Reasoning. Answer: is a logical process where a
conclusion is derived from premises that are known or assumed
to be true. It follows a specific pattern, such as the syllogistic
form, where the conclusion is necessarily true if the premises
are true, and the logical structure is valid. (Syllogistic form is a
deductive reasoning pattern that consists of two premises and a
conclusion, following the "all A is B, and all B is C, therefore
all A is C" structure)
, ◉ True Reasoning. Answer: refers to the process of drawing
logical conclusions that align with objective reality or factual
accuracy. It involves logical coherence, consistency, and
adherence to evidence and facts, leading to valid and reliable
conclusions.
◉ Valid Reasoning. Answer: refers to the logical structure of an
argument where the conclusion necessarily follows fallacy from
the premises. It ensures that if the premises are true, the
conclusion must also be true, irrespective of the actual
truthfulness of the premises.
◉ Strong Reasoning. Answer: refers to the use of sound logic,
compelling evidence, and persuasive elements to support a
claim or argument. It demonstrates coherence, relevance, and
logical consistency, making it more likely to convince or
persuade others.
◉ Unsound. Answer: refers to an argument that is flawed or
invalid, lacking logical reasoning or proper evidence to support
its conclusion.
◉ Sound. Answer: refers to an argument that is strong and valid,
with logical reasoning and evidence that supports its conclusion,
making it reliable and persuasive.
◉ Cogent. Answer: refers to an argument that is convincing and
well-supported, presenting strong reasoning and evidence that
makes it highly persuasive and likely to be true.
◉ Uncogent. Answer: refers to an argument that is weak or
unconvincing, lacking strong reasoning or sufficient evidence to
support its conclusion, making it less reliable or persuasive.
◉ Anchoring or Adjustment Bias. Answer: refers to the
tendency to rely heavily on an initial reference point (anchor)
