100% de satisfacción garantizada Inmediatamente disponible después del pago Tanto en línea como en PDF No estas atado a nada 4.2 TrustPilot
logo-home
Examen

PE ETHICS EXAM ANSWERS BASED ON THE TEXAS ENGINEERING PRACTICE ACT AND BOARD RULES LATEST UPDATE

Puntuación
-
Vendido
-
Páginas
12
Grado
A+
Subido en
05-10-2025
Escrito en
2025/2026

PE ETHICS EXAM ANSWERS BASED ON THE TEXAS ENGINEERING PRACTICE ACT AND BOARD RULES LATEST UPDATE

Institución
PE ETHICS
Grado
PE ETHICS









Ups! No podemos cargar tu documento ahora. Inténtalo de nuevo o contacta con soporte.

Escuela, estudio y materia

Institución
PE ETHICS
Grado
PE ETHICS

Información del documento

Subido en
5 de octubre de 2025
Número de páginas
12
Escrito en
2025/2026
Tipo
Examen
Contiene
Preguntas y respuestas

Temas

  • pe ethics exam

Vista previa del contenido

PE ETHICS EXAM ANSWERS BASED ON THE TEXAS
ENGINEERING PRACTICE ACT AND BOARD RULES LATEST
UPDATE



Scenario 1 – Direct Supervision and Sealing of Work (Q1–Q4)

Maria is a graduate engineer who recently joined a mid-sized structural engineering firm. She
works under John, a licensed Professional Engineer (PE). The firm has been retained to design a
pedestrian bridge over a creek in a public park.

Maria prepares all preliminary calculations and CAD drawings for the bridge. John rarely checks
in with her and, due to a busy schedule, does not review her work in detail before sealing the
drawings and submitting them for permitting. Later, Maria discovers that an error in her load
calculations was overlooked. Although not catastrophic, the error reduces the safety factor below
code requirements.

Meanwhile, John provides copies of the sealed drawings to a local contractor who uses them as
the basis for a design-build bid on a separate project without Maria’s knowledge.

Q1. Which board rule most directly addresses John’s responsibility to provide direct supervision
over Maria’s engineering work before sealing it?
A) §137.55(a)
B) §137.59(a)
C) §137.63(b)(2)
D) §137.33(b)
E) §139.17
Q2. Which section of the Act or Board Rules most clearly prohibits a license holder from
affixing their seal without adequate review?
A) §137.63(c)(1)
B) §137.33(f)
C) §137.55(b)
D) §1001.004
E) §137.65(a)

Q3. By allowing a contractor to use sealed drawings prepared for a different project, John may
have violated which provision?
A) §137.63(a) – Offering services beyond competence
B) §137.33(i) – Misuse of engineering documents
C) §137.59(a) – Supervision of non-licensed persons

, D) §137.65(b) – Misrepresentation of services
E) §139.13 – Enforcement proceedings

Q4. If Maria, an unlicensed graduate engineer, signs off on calculations as “Engineer,” which
part of the Act is most directly violated?
A) §1001.301 – Practice without a license
B) §137.59(a) – Supervision of work
C) §137.63(c)(1) – Misrepresentation
D) §137.65(a) – Professional conduct
E) §139.17 – Administrative hearings



Scenario 2 – Conflict of Interest and Gifts (Q5–Q8)
David, a licensed PE, works for a city water utility. While reviewing bids for a wastewater
treatment project, David notices that one bidder is his former employer, who has offered him free
tickets to a sporting event. David accepts the tickets but claims they will not influence his
judgment.

Later, David’s supervisor learns of this and reminds him of the importance of impartiality in
engineering decisions.

Q5. Which rule addresses conflicts of interest requiring disclosure to employers or clients?
A) §137.63(a)
B) §137.63(c)(3)
C) §137.59(b)
D) §137.65(a)
E) §139.31

Q6. Accepting free tickets from a bidder most directly implicates which board rule?
A) §137.57(a) – Gifts or favors that may influence judgment
B) §137.59(a) – Supervision of unlicensed persons
C) §137.63(b)(1) – Representation of qualifications
D) §1001.301 – License requirement
E) §139.13 – Disciplinary actions

Q7. Which action would have been most consistent with the Board Rules?
A) Accept the tickets since David no longer works for the bidder.
B) Disclose the offer and refuse the tickets.
C) Accept the tickets but abstain from voting on the contract.
D) Keep the tickets and not report them since they were personal.
E) Ask a colleague to accept the tickets instead.
$22.99
Accede al documento completo:

100% de satisfacción garantizada
Inmediatamente disponible después del pago
Tanto en línea como en PDF
No estas atado a nada

Conoce al vendedor

Seller avatar
Los indicadores de reputación están sujetos a la cantidad de artículos vendidos por una tarifa y las reseñas que ha recibido por esos documentos. Hay tres niveles: Bronce, Plata y Oro. Cuanto mayor reputación, más podrás confiar en la calidad del trabajo del vendedor.
DrMedinaReed Chamberlain College Nursing
Ver perfil
Seguir Necesitas iniciar sesión para seguir a otros usuarios o asignaturas
Vendido
2331
Miembro desde
3 año
Número de seguidores
1320
Documentos
2084
Última venta
3 días hace
Perfect Expert scores

Welcome to my all inclusive store. Get all quality study materials at a cost-effective price

4.8

2742 reseñas

5
2553
4
64
3
54
2
24
1
47

Recientemente visto por ti

Por qué los estudiantes eligen Stuvia

Creado por compañeros estudiantes, verificado por reseñas

Calidad en la que puedes confiar: escrito por estudiantes que aprobaron y evaluado por otros que han usado estos resúmenes.

¿No estás satisfecho? Elige otro documento

¡No te preocupes! Puedes elegir directamente otro documento que se ajuste mejor a lo que buscas.

Paga como quieras, empieza a estudiar al instante

Sin suscripción, sin compromisos. Paga como estés acostumbrado con tarjeta de crédito y descarga tu documento PDF inmediatamente.

Student with book image

“Comprado, descargado y aprobado. Así de fácil puede ser.”

Alisha Student

Preguntas frecuentes