100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached 4.2 TrustPilot
logo-home
Essay

Murder Evaluation Plan

Rating
-
Sold
-
Pages
3
Grade
A+
Uploaded on
28-07-2024
Written in
2023/2024

An in-depth evaluation of the law on murder. The plan provides a balanced argument and is of an A* standard.

Institution
Course








Whoops! We can’t load your doc right now. Try again or contact support.

Written for

Study Level
Examinator
Subject
Unit

Document information

Uploaded on
July 28, 2024
Number of pages
3
Written in
2023/2024
Type
Essay
Professor(s)
Unknown
Grade
A+

Subjects

Content preview

“A rickety structure set upon shaky foundations”


Terminology

‘Unlawful killing of reasonable creature in being’

 This definition is likely to cause confusion amongst laypeople, limiting the law’s
accessibility. It should be updated to the simple definition of the ‘unlawful killing of a
human being’ to increase understanding and make the law more transparent.

‘Death’

 There is no single definition of ‘death’, meaning problems of with consistency could
arise.
 Whilst Malcherek recognised that switching off a life support machine does not
constitute murder, there is still much ambiguity surrounding the term.
 For this reason, different groups have disputed whether a foetus can be regarded as
a ‘human being’.
 The case of AG’s Reference (No. 3 of 1994) suggests that a foetus is not a human
being.
 However, the common law needs to be consolidated to clarify this position.

Mens Rea

 The mens rea of ‘malice aforethought’ is suggests that hatred or evil intent and
premeditation is required.
 Case law does not substantiate this, as demonstrated by Vickers, where D attempted
to burgle a sweet shop and intended to cause serious harm when confronted by the
owner.
 Therefore, it is clear that term needs to be altered to resolve issues with misleading
terminology.

Euthanasia

 The fact that Lord Coke's definition does not account for cases of murder out of love
or compassion is highly problematic.
 This suggests that a tailor-made offence of mercy killing needs to be created to avail
a defendant of complete liability.
 The fact that judges can differentiate when they set a defendant’s tariff can be seen
to resolve this problem to an extent.
 However, it does not avoid the issue with defendants of varying levels of intention
being placed in the same category.
 It is unjust that a serial killer such as Peter Sutcliffe and a defendant intending serious
harm like Cunningham is labelled in the same way as an accessory to euthanasia such
as Francis Ingles. As a result, it seems clear that the law in this area needs to be
reformed to prevent it from having such a wide scope. In line with this, it can be
$6.16
Get access to the full document:

100% satisfaction guarantee
Immediately available after payment
Both online and in PDF
No strings attached

Get to know the seller
Seller avatar
eleanortrend

Also available in package deal

Get to know the seller

Seller avatar
eleanortrend A Level Notes
Follow You need to be logged in order to follow users or courses
Sold
5
Member since
1 year
Number of followers
0
Documents
21
Last sold
7 months ago

0.0

0 reviews

5
0
4
0
3
0
2
0
1
0

Recently viewed by you

Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their tests and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can instantly pick a different document that better fits what you're looking for.

Pay as you like, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Frequently asked questions