Summary CRIMPROC: all semester 1 prescribed cases

Kaya Borkowski


Criminal Procedure Cases
Semester 1

1. S v Halgryn 2002
2. S v Lusu 2005
3. S v Mugera 2022
4. Ralekwa v Minister of Safety & Security 2004
5. Govender v Minister of Safety & Security 2001
6. Ex Parte Minister of Safety & Security: In re S v Walters 2002
7. S v Dlamini; S v Dladla; S v Joubert; S v Schietekat 1999 (headnote)
8. Mathebula v The State 2009 (headnote)
9. S v Van der Merwe 2023
10. S v Grobler 1966 (headnote)
11. S v Benjamin 1980 (headnote)
12. S v Whitehead 2008
13. Dube v The State 2009
14. The President of the Republic of South Africa v South African Rugby Football Union
1999 (paras 35 – 49; 63 – 76; 104)
15. S v Khoza 1989 (headnote)
16. S v McIntyre 1997
17. Mudau v S 2013
18. S v Shuping 1983
19. S v Lubaxa 2001
20. S v Mathebula 1997
21. S v Fielies and another 2006
22. S v Zinn 1969
23. S v Malgas 2001
24. S v Dodo 2001 (headnote)
25. S v Tshabalala 2002
26. Shinga v The State & Another: S v O’Connell 2007 (headnote)
27. Mshudulu v Regional Court Magistrate, Kimberley 2023


Table of Cases


Case Key words Upshot

S v Halgryn 2002 - Legal aid lawyer, - the test for poor representation that
accused dissatisfied renders a trial unfair is objective

S v Lusu 2005 - Accused requested - Right to legal representation
postponement to - the presiding officer cannot prevent an
allow him to apply to accused from applying to Legal Aid.
legal aid



Distribution of this document is illegal and constitutes a copy-right violation