AQA A-level RELIGIOUS STUDIES 7062/2E Paper 2E Study of Religion and Dialogues: Judaism Version: 1.0 Final IB/M/Jun23/E3 7062/2E Monday 19 June 2023QUESTION PAPER & MARKING SCHEME/ [MERGED] Mark scheme June 2023

AQA A-level RELIGIOUS STUDIES 7062/2E Paper 2E Study of Religion and Dialogues: Judaism Version: 1.0 Final IB/M/Jun23/E3 7062/2E Monday 19 June 2023 Afternoon Time allowed: 3 hours Materials For this paper you must have: • an AQA 16-page answer book. Instructions • Use black ink or black ball-point pen. • Write the information required on the front of your answer book. The Paper Reference is 7062/2E. • Answer: – both two-part questions from Section A, and – one question from Section B, and – one question from Section C. • Do all rough work in your answer book. Cross through any work you do not want to be marked. Information • The marks for questions are shown in brackets. • The maximum mark for this paper is 100. • In each two-part question in Section A, the first part tests your knowledge and understanding, while the second part tests your skills of reasoning and evaluation. • The one-part questions in Sections B and C test your knowledge and understanding and your skills of reasoning and evaluation. • You will be marked on your ability to: – use good English – organise information clearly – use specialist vocabulary where appropriate. A-level RELIGIOUS STUDIES Paper 2E Study of Religion and Dialogues: Judaism 2 IB/M/Jun23/7062/2E Section A: Study of Judaism Answer both questions in this section. Each question has two parts. Question 1 0 1 . 1 Examine why there are different Jewish views about the concept of stewardship. [10 marks] and 0 1 . 2 ‘Martin Buber’s ideas about the relationship between God and humankind do not make sense.’ Evaluate this claim. [15 marks] Question 2 0 2 . 1 Examine how Judaism responds to materialistic secular values. [10 marks] and 0 2 . 2 ‘Judaism responds successfully to issues raised by genetic engineering.’ Evaluate this claim. [15 marks] 3 IB/M/Jun23/7062/2E Turn over ► Section B: The dialogue between philosophy and Judaism Answer one question from this section. Either Question 3 0 3 . 1 ‘Philosophical arguments for the existence of God show that Jewish beliefs about God are not coherent.’ Critically examine and evaluate this view with reference to the dialogue between Judaism and philosophy. [25 marks] or Question 4 0 4 . 1 ‘Philosophy does not support belief in the authority of the Tenakh.’ Critically examine and evaluate this view with reference to the dialogue between Judaism and philosophy. [25 marks] Turn over for Section C 4 IB/M/Jun23/7062/2E Section C: The dialogue between ethics and Judaism Answer one question from this section. Either Question 5 0 5 . 1 ‘Natural Moral Law gives Judaism clear guidance on issues surrounding wealth.’ Critically examine and evaluate this view with reference to the dialogue between Judaism and ethical studies. [25 marks] or Question 6 0 6 . 1 ‘Bentham’s consequential ethics have no value for Jews.’ Critically examine and evaluate this view with reference to the dialogue between Judaism and Bentham. [25 marks] END OF QUESTIONS Copyright information For confidentiality purposes, all acknowledgements of third-party copyright material are published in a separate booklet. This booklet is published after each live examination series and is available for free download from . Permission to reproduce all copyright material has been applied for. In some cases, efforts to contact copyright-holders may have been unsuccessful and AQA will be happy to rectify any omissions of acknowledgements. If you have any queries please contact the Copyright Team. Copyright © 2023 AQA and its licensors. All rights reserved. *236A7062/2E* A-level RELIGIOUS STUDIES 7062/2E Paper 2E Study of Religion and Dialogues: Judaism Mark scheme June 2023 Version: 1.0 Final *236A7062/2E/MS* MARK SCHEME – A-LEVEL RELIGIOUS STUDIES – 7062/2E – JUNE 2023 2 Mark schemes are prepared by the Lead Assessment Writer and considered, together with the relevant questions, by a panel of subject teachers. This mark scheme includes any amendments made at the standardisation events which all associates participate in and is the scheme which was used by them in this examination. The standardisation process ensures that the mark scheme covers the students’ responses to questions and that every associate understands and applies it in the same correct way. As preparation for standardisation each associate analyses a number of students’ scripts. Alternative answers not already covered by the mark scheme are discussed and legislated for. If, after the standardisation process, associates encounter unusual answers which have not been raised they are required to refer these to the Lead Examiner. It must be stressed that a mark scheme is a working document, in many cases further developed and expanded on the basis of students’ reactions to a particular paper. Assumptions about future mark schemes on the basis of one year’s document should be avoided; whilst the guiding principles of assessment remain constant, details will change, depending on the content of a particular examination paper. Further copies of this mark scheme are available from Copyright information AQA retains the copyright on all its publications. However, registered schools/colleges for AQA are permitted to copy material from this booklet for their own internal use, with the following important exception: AQA cannot give permission to schools/colleges to photocopy any material that is acknowledged to a third party even for internal use within the centre. Copyright © 2023 AQA and its licensors. All rights reserved. MARK SCHEME – A-LEVEL RELIGIOUS STUDIES – 7062/2E – JUNE 2023 3 Methods of Marking It is essential that, in fairness to students, all examiners use the same methods of marking. The advice given here may seem very obvious, but it is important that all examiners follow it as exactly as possible. 1. If you have any doubts about the mark to award, consult your Team Leader. 2. Refer constantly to the mark scheme throughout marking. It is extremely important that it is strictly adhered to. 3. Remember, you must always credit accurate, relevant and appropriate answers which are not given in the mark scheme. 4. Do not credit material that is irrelevant to the question or to the stated target, however impressive that material might be. 5. If a one-word answer is required and a list is given, take the first answer (unless this has been crossed out). 6. If you are wavering as to whether or not to award a mark, the criterion should be, ‘Is the student nearer those who have given a correct answer or those who have little idea?’ 7. Read the information below about using Levels of Response mark schemes. 8. Be prepared to award the full range of marks. Do not hesitate to give full marks when the answer merits full marks or to give no marks where there is nothing creditable in an answer. 9. No half marks or bonus marks are to be used under any circumstances. 10. Remember, the key to good and fair marking is consistency. Do not change the standard of your marking once you have started. Levels of Response Marking In A-level Religious Studies, differentiation is largely achieved by outcome on the basis of students’ responses. To facilitate this, levels of response marking has been devised for many questions. Levels of response marking requires a quite different approach from the examiner than the traditional ‘point for point’ marking. It is essential that the whole response is read and then allocated to the level it best fits. If a student demonstrates knowledge, understanding and/or evaluation at a certain level, he/she must be credited at that level. Length of response or literary ability should not be confused with genuine religious studies skills. For example, a short answer which shows a high level of conceptual ability must be credited at that level. (If there is a band of marks allocated to a level, discrimination should be made with reference to the development of the answer.) Levels are tied to specific skills. Examiners should refer to the stated assessment target objective of a question (see mark scheme) when there is any doubt as to the relevance of a student’s response. Levels of response mark schemes include either examples of possible students’ responses or material which they might use. These are intended as a guide only. It is anticipated that students will produce a wide range of responses to each question. It is a feature of levels of response mark schemes that examiners are prepared to reward fully, responses which are obviously valid and of high ability but do not conform exactly to the requirements of a particular level. This should only be necessary occasionally and where this occurs examiners must indicate, by a brief written explanation, why their assessment does not conform to the levels of response laid down in the mark scheme. Such scripts should be referred to the Lead Examiner. MARK SCHEME – A-LEVEL RELIGIOUS STUDIES – 7062/2E – JUNE 2023 4 Assessment of Quality of Written Communication Quality of written communication will be assessed in all components and in relation to all assessment objectives. Where students are required to produce extended written material in English, they will be assessed on the quality of written communication. The quality of written communication skills of the student will be one of the factors influencing the actual mark awarded within the level of response. In reading an extended response, the examiner will therefore consider if it is cogently and coherently written, ie decide whether the answer: • presents relevant information in a form that suits its purposes • is legible and that spelling, punctuation and grammar are accurate, so that meaning is clear • is suitably structured and that the style of writing is appropriate. MARK SCHEME – A-LEVEL RELIGIOUS STUDIES – 7062/2E – JUNE 2023 5 LEVEL DESCRIPTORS Levels of Response: 10 marks A-level – AO1 Level 5 9–10 • Knowledge and critical understanding is accurate, relevant and fully developed in breadth and depth with very good use of detailed and relevant evidence which may include textual/scriptural references where appropriate. • Where appropriate, good knowledge and understanding of the diversity of views and/or scholarly opinion is demonstrated. • Clear and coherent presentation of ideas with precise use of the appropriate subject vocabulary. Level 4 7–8 • Knowledge and critical understanding is accurate and mostly relevant with good development in breadth and depth shown through good use of relevant evidence which may include textual/scriptural references where appropriate. • Where appropriate, alternative views and/or scholarly opinion are explained. • Mostly clear and coherent presentation of ideas with good use of the appropriate subject vocabulary. Level 3 5–6 • Knowledge and critical understanding is generally accurate and relevant with development in breadth and/or depth shown through some use of evidence and/or examples which may include textual/scriptural references where appropriate. • Where appropriate, there is some familiarity with the diversity of views and/or scholarly opinion. • Some organisation of ideas and coherence with reasonable use of the appropriate subject vocabulary. Level 2 3–4 • Knowledge and critical understanding is limited, with limited development in breadth and/or depth shown through limited use of evidence and/or examples which may include textual/scriptural references where appropriate. • Where appropriate, limited reference may be made to alternative views and/or scholarly opinion. • Limited organisation of ideas and coherence and use of subject vocabulary. Level 1 1–2 • Knowledge and critical understanding is basic with little or no development. • There may be a basic awareness of alternative views and/or scholarly opinion. • Isolated elements of accurate and relevant information and basic use of appropriate subject vocabulary. 0 • No accurate or relevant material to credit. MARK SCHEME – A-LEVEL RELIGIOUS STUDIES – 7062/2E – JUNE 2023 6 Levels of Response: 15 marks A-level – AO2 Level 5 13–15 • A very well-focused response to the issue(s) raised. • Perceptive discussion of different views, including, where appropriate, those of scholars or schools of thought with critical analysis. • There is an appropriate evaluation fully supported by the reasoning. • Precise use of the appropriate subject vocabulary. Level 4 10–12 • A well-focused response to the issue(s) raised. • Different views are discussed, including, where appropriate, those of scholars or schools of thought, with some critical analysis. • There is an appropriate evaluation supported by the reasoning. • Good use of the appropriate subject vocabulary. Level 3 7–9 • A general response to the issue(s) raised. • Different views are discussed, including, where appropriate, those of scholars or schools of thought. • An evaluation is made that is consistent with some of the reasoning. • Reasonable use of the appropriate subject vocabulary. Level 2 4–6 • A limited response to the issue(s) raised. • Presentation of a point of view relevant to the issue with some supporting evidence and argument. • Limited attempt at the appropriate use of subject vocabulary. Level 1 1–3 • A basic response to the issue(s) raised. • A point of view is stated, with some evidence or reason(s) in support. • Some attempt at the appropriate use of subject vocabulary. 0 • No accurate or relevant material to credit. MARK SCHEME – A-LEVEL RELIGIOUS STUDIES – 7062/2E – JUNE 2023 7 0 1 . 1 Examine why there are different Jewish views about the concept of stewardship. [10 marks] Target: AO1.3: Knowledge and understanding of religion and belief, including cause and significance of similarities and differences in belief, teaching and practice. Note: This content is indicative rather than prescriptive and students are not obliged to refer to all the material contained in this mark scheme. Any legitimate answer will be assessed on its merits according to the generic levels of response. One reason that there are different views ar