Written by students who passed Immediately available after payment Read online or as PDF Wrong document? Swap it for free 4.6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Summary

Summary 1.8 Problem 3: multi-tasking and multimedia

Rating
3.0
(2)
Sold
2
Pages
4
Uploaded on
15-06-2016
Written in
2015/2016

This is a detailed explanation of the problem including the articles.

Institution
Module

Content preview

PROBLEM 3: TECHNOLOGY AND LEARNING

THEORIES IN ALL THE ARTICLES

 Arousal theory: holds that adding entertaining auditory adjuncts will make the learning task more
interesting and thereby increase the learner's overall level of arousal (leading to increased attention).
INCORRECT
 Coherence theory: when giving multimedia explanation, use few rather than many extraneous words
and pictures. CORRECT
 Cognitive load theory: instructional messages should be designed in ways that minimize the chances
of overloading the learner’s cognitive system. CORRECT
 Dual coding theory: visual and verbal materials are processed in different processing systems.
CORRECT
 Cognitive load theory: processing capacities of visual and verbal working memories (or information-
processing channels) are severely limited. CORRECT
 Constructivist learning theory: meaningful learning occurs when learners actively select relevant
information, organize it into coherent representations, and integrate it with other knowledge.
CORRECT
 Redundancy effect: two sources of information at once causes overload. CORRECT
 Split-attention hypothesis: adding redundant text hurts student learning of a multimedia
explanation. CORRECT
 Information delivery hypothesis: two ways of presenting words are better than one. INCORRECT
 Redundancy principle: when making a multimedia presentation consisting of a narrated animation,
don’t add on-screen text that duplicates words that are already spoken in narration. CORRECT
 Coherence effect: inserted video and narration activate inappropriate prior knowledge. CORRECT
 Emotional interest hypothesis: adding interesting details to a passage increases overall arousal and
therefore results in more learning overall.. INCORRECT
 Seductive details hypothesis: students try harder to understand material when the material is
presented in a way that highlights the underlying conceptual structure. CORRECT
 Coherence principle: students understand a multimedia explanation more deeply when interesting
but conceptually irrelevant video and narration are excluded rather than included. CORRECT
 Bottle neck theory: CORRECT.

RESULTS FROM EACH AR TICLE


A COHERENCE EFFECT IN MULTIMEDIA LEARNIN G (MORENO & MAYER)
They tested if adding bells and whistles (background music and/or sounds) would improve the quality of a
multimedia instructional message. For some students, the authors added background music (Group NM),
sounds (Group NS), both (Group NSM), or neither (Group N).

 On tests of retention and transfer, groups receiving music performed worse than groups not receiving
music; and groups receiving sounds performed worse (only in Experiment 2) than groups not
receiving sounds.
 The more relevant and integrated sounds are, the more they will help students' understanding of the
materials (better transfer and retention).

Written for

Institution
Study
Module

Document information

Uploaded on
June 15, 2016
Number of pages
4
Written in
2015/2016
Type
SUMMARY

Subjects

$4.16
Get access to the full document:

Wrong document? Swap it for free Within 14 days of purchase and before downloading, you can choose a different document. You can simply spend the amount again.
Written by students who passed
Immediately available after payment
Read online or as PDF


Also available in package deal

Reviews from verified buyers

Showing all 2 reviews
8 year ago

8 year ago

3.0

2 reviews

5
1
4
0
3
0
2
0
1
1
Trustworthy reviews on Stuvia

All reviews are made by real Stuvia users after verified purchases.

Get to know the seller

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
nataliabatres Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam
Follow You need to be logged in order to follow users or courses
Sold
116
Member since
10 year
Number of followers
61
Documents
30
Last sold
2 year ago

3.9

41 reviews

5
14
4
15
3
8
2
1
1
3

Trending documents

Recently viewed by you

Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their exams and reviewed by others who've used these revision notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No problem! You can straightaway pick a different document that better suits what you're after.

Pay as you like, start learning straight away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and smashed it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Frequently asked questions